OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64497822 about 7 years ago

Hi,
way/499642668
this is a powerline

64522552 about 7 years ago

This small private roads are highway=service + service=driveway. Most of the time it is better if this driveway aren't mappd at all

64525246 about 7 years ago

tracks,service+service=driveway but not residential

64532708 about 7 years ago

Hi,
Please do not tag paths as residential roads

64227196 about 7 years ago

Dann werde ich zur Strafe jetzt wohl ein paar Grenzpolygone flicken müssen.

64227196 about 7 years ago

noch mal gut gegangen?

64227196 about 7 years ago

Ich habe es mal revertiert bevor es vergessen wird. Die neuen Gebäude habe ich per copy und paste wieder eingefügt.

@ojirotp
start here:

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=112&error=119110266

fix 20 similar errors and wie will forget this little incident :)

64270008 about 7 years ago

Hi,
do you map after secret imagery sources?

In Josm zoom in until the scale reads ~ 5m
Draw a 3m line underneath the scale. While the line is still highlighted hit "cntl" + "o". Now you have a circle 3m in diamter. Move this circle over the roads. Only when this circle fits over the complete waylenght, the road can be tagged as "track" or better. In doubt, always tag the next lower classification, or don't map the road/path at all.

64255407 about 7 years ago

Hi, please add a name to the corresponding Street to complete the address tagging.

64251750 about 7 years ago

way/375121592
tunnel=culvert +
layer=-1
is not correct

64197771 about 7 years ago

I think not

64197771 about 7 years ago

way/25116638

building=yes?

64199304 about 7 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcKewl94jR4

64164549 about 7 years ago

It is not a road at all, to me this line looks more like a fence.
And elsewhere - two tracks left in the sand by a tractor do not implicate the existance of a unclassified road.
With all this bogus roads, the map is allready useless.

59778675 about 7 years ago

hi,
could you please fix this note:

note/1571459#map=19/-17.87451/31.00787&layers=N

thanks

63603288 about 7 years ago

Hi,
do not draw new objects over existing objects
(no "landuse=residential" inside a existing "landuse=residential", no "highway=residential" over a existing "highway=construction") Change the tagging instead. Do not tag buildings with "area=yes". Use "building=yes (*)" instead. Square your buildings, make sure that they have the correct shape and size. Area type ways like buildings or landuse should not share nodes with line type ways like highways or waterways. The name tag should only be used for official names. Never use it as a description or for names made up by yourself. Please fix these issues before adding new. Maybe you should consider to switch to JOSM because of its build in data validator. It provides also a more sophisticated building plug-in.

55038009 about 7 years ago

Hallo,
da hab ich mich wohl ein wenig verklickt

59581547 about 7 years ago

Hi edvac,
This is a typical edit by an local mapper. Therefore its is very valuable. He or she is new to OSM. I do not know what kind of edits can be done with MAPS,Me. But I guess that its functionality is very limited.
I would expect that it is not possible to edit existing objects or to add place nodes. So if you are interested in this area try to fix the data. If you turn on the error Notes Layer you will find more hints left from NWR2018. Fortunately, there are other mapping activities in Africa besides HOT.

61256954 over 7 years ago

Vandalism may sound a little harsh, but please, take a look into the history of this relation
relation/2280649/history
I fear, you may have accidently deleted more valuable information like this in many other cases. Ideally, you should use more than one image source to determine the shape of large buildings. Some experience would also help. Please refer to the wiki for correct tagging and interpretation of arial imagery

61256954 over 7 years ago

hi,
to me this looks more like vandalism than an improvement!