Hi Cole,
the HOT tasking manager is blocked for me due to some previous conflicts with HOT

Hi wallacegara,
there are several bridges mapped by you that are not visible on bing. Is this local knowledge or did you do it to avoid warnings?

I am asking because these two roads are certainly not correct

way/1291888933
way/1291888932

Hi Cole,
the project manager seems to read my comments but is not responsive to my messages so far. Are you in contact with the managers?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions

For reference only:
https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/?active=1052&ext=28.94149,-14.81597,28.97518,-14.79475#active=7110&mapCenter=30.16746%2C-17.39656%2C17

Hello Cole Myers,
I think this will look similar to all other urban settlements in Zimbabwe. Where roads always run parallel to the buildings. It usually looks a bit chaotic during the construction phase, as in this case, and it's only a temporary snapshot what we can see in this certainly not really recent footage. That's why I use highway =construction until the area is fully built up. With this tagging it is also easy to find the roads again and to update them with each new background layer version

changed as suggested

node/11964860719/history

relation/17693965

node/11966349223

changeset/152451850

blown-out highlights due to reflective surfaces such as metal roofs.

compare with esri

tag like here:
way/274466253

#hotosm-project-955 #MissingMaps #RedCross

no one has ever come back to update the data! That means all the work was for nothing and nobody cares

I bet the same will happen to this project

please do not use made up tags like:

ID=25
residential=urban
suburb=riverside
or from Changeset #152393406
school=yes
residential=house

either create a boundary relation or add a simple place node

boundary=administrative

place=*

can you share the the boundarys ?

here are two exsamples in Epworth:

relation/5129306

relation/5129307

Hello Ruthmapper,
@surveyor_jr,

as review_requested is yes

I just removed all of the roads you have mapped in this task. Except of this one:
way/1289077826
this road is only a little bit modified by me.
Please extend this road by following the track until you reach this nodes:
node/11953590749
node/11953590748
Make sure that end of the road is connected.
Tag it as track because it is mostly for agricultural purpose and it is only connected to other tracks. Therefore the classification could not be higher.
Here is the editing link:
osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=1289077826#map=19/-17.33073/30.21341

All the other ways, that were mapped in this task, were judged by the width, only paths. Not really necessary for navigation and planning. But once drawn a burden for all who are trying to keep the map up do date.

to blame:
@Kateregga1
@surveyor_jr
@Letwin

Wouldn't it make more sense to remove most of these roads?

Hallo Ulli,
könntest du bitte zuerst deine Hinterlassenschaften in Sambia aufräumen bevor du hier die Karte auch noch ruinierst

osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Es sollte so passen
Kann sein das restriction:conditional von keepright nicht ausgewertet wird.
grüße
Ralf

Danke,
deprecated since 2013

not bad for a first edit.

However, I would suggest a few small improvements:

1. the main road should always be continuous
node/11492238579
node/11492238583
(on this nodes it should not continue in to dead end driveways)
2. When the road is usable for a car then it should be tagged as track,service,unclassified...
Here it should be most likely highway=service and highway=service + service=driveway for the short parts on private properties.

way/1237326637
way/1237326636
highway=path should be fine here

nanana

Hello,
what was your initial intention with this changeset? All the roads and railroads were already drawn. You should not draw new features over existing ones.
Is there a source for tagging the A5 as an Motorway?
I have reverted your changes for now.
Please let me know if you need any help

way/237214030#map=19/8.96996/11.38936

way/1226921701#map=17/8.96084/11.36062

what is this?
Have you ever checked these AI roads against the background layer?

Residential streets are not so crooked.
Almost always parallel to the gable end
Bing is currently more up-to-date than ESRI

no buildings here! (where is the shadow. compare with
osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=1224594883#map=20/-16.33540/31.15652
)