OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
13343457 about 6 years ago

> Yes. I know. But this only applies to famous people.
May be because it's a huge work.
I don't know if there is a "rule" that that prohibits ordinary peoples in wikidata.

In OSM, the wiki page Tag:cemetery=grave warn that "Only significant graves are to be mapped."
cemetery=grave

13343457 about 6 years ago

Hi Władysław,
Do you know this web app based on wikidata :
http://graves.wiki/#/map/@50.07710,19.94778,15z

Here a quick query to find peoples buried in this cemetery :
https://w.wiki/DqQ

As you could see, there is 1590 peoples (and 605 with an image).

To be displayed on this map, the coordinates of the buried place must be added.
I do this for about 30 persons founded on OSM : way/25439265#map=16/50.0752/19.9523

Or in this article : https://fakty.interia.pl/galerie/polskalokalna/zdjecie,iId,1384939,iAId,110720

Best regards,

Yves

77782743 about 6 years ago

Ok. My (other) source is public domain ;-)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bahamas_Government_House.jpg

77783746 about 6 years ago

Seem good with several imageries.
Ask to user Tauntaun who modified the coastline one year ago.
way/22576553/history

77782743 about 6 years ago

Sorry, I don't understand the issue ?

77717645 about 6 years ago

Thanks to check that.
I forgot to clean this after a manual import.

Yves

76884224 about 6 years ago

Yes because the value did not correspond to a valid File.

Same issue with the tag picture ;-)

See history of the following node :

node/1319171609/history

Best regards,
Yves

72219547 about 6 years ago

Hi,

wikipedia key for website is unappropriate.
I fix it for Weingut Freiherr Roeder von Diersburg

Best regards,
Yves

74505776 about 6 years ago

Hi,

wikipedia key for website is unapropriate.
I fix it for Division office

Best regards

70338691 about 6 years ago

Hi,

The dam name=Wae Ela was duplicated. Also, the key wikipedia is incorrect (wikimapia is NOT wikipedia).
The key should be url or website if this this the official website (see wiki).

The way with tag id=0 is not usable.

Please, could you clean you data.

Best regards,
Yves

77533836 about 6 years ago

you're welcome :)

77455866 about 6 years ago

Bonjour,

Merci pour cette contribution. J'ai fait quelques corrections pour que la borne s'affiche sur une carte.
Ne pas hésiter à chercher dans le wiki le(s) tag(s) le plus appropriés.
Ici : osm.wiki/FR:Tag:historic%3Dmilestone

Cordialement,
_
Yves

1270404 about 6 years ago

Hi,
Some of your OSM objects use the local:picture key that is "unusual" ;-)
Could you upload them and use the image or wikimedia_commons keys ?
Or remove theses tags ?
In the second case, you could use the OSM ID in the local filename or in a tag to link your local photo to the OSM object on your map...
Best regards,
_
Yves
PS: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/O0G

71020841 about 6 years ago

Hi,

I found user eddyp that add this key 10 years ago.

"local:picture" doesn't "exist". It should be "image".

BR

55176837 about 6 years ago

Hi David,

The image value "Optimus Prime" is unusable. I couldn't find any picture on wikimedia commons with this name ;)

Could you upload a picture and add it's commons filename or URL ?

Regards,
_
Yves

image=File:Optimus_Prime_Model.JPG
image=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Optimus_Prime_Model.JPG

13343457 about 6 years ago

I didn't understood that "Załaduj groby" was a button to load data :D

There is a search button that don't seem to work. (display an empty popup)

13343457 about 6 years ago

Thank you very much for the link :-)

I started a talk to document this usage:
osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:cemetery%3Dgrave#relation_type.3Dperson_used_to_described_who_is_buried_in_a_grave_.3F

BR,


Yves

13343457 about 6 years ago

Also, I understood how theses relation are used.

The wiki suggest to use buried:wikidata=* tag and described the person in wikidata.

See cemetery=grave

13343457 about 6 years ago

This one could be deleted. There is 2 relations type=person
relation/2521437 (with a member role=tomb)
relation/2449409 (without member)

The second could be deleted (values could be merged with the first one).

13343457 about 6 years ago

Ok thanks : I understand what is these unusual relations :-)

And I found the grave : node/1943840858

So, I think that relation/2449409 could be deleted :-)


Yves