Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for the feedback. I have now changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please look into the changeset (107475676) with modifications.
Regards,
priymose.

Hello SafetyIng,
Thanks for the feedback. I have tagged the driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset(107475525) for the changes made.
Regards,
priymose.

Hello SafetyIng,
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107475402) with suggested modifications. Good day!
Regards,
priymose.

Hello SafetyIng,
Thanks for checking into my edits. Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. I have now changed the classification to driveway. Happy to learn from you!
Regards,
priymose.

Hello SafetyIng, 
Apologies for misinterpreting the driveway. I have made the changes as per your suggestion. Happy to learn from you!
Regards,
priymose.

Hello SafetyIng,
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107424375) with suggested modifications. Good day!
Regards,
priymose.

Hello SafetyIng,
Apologies for this genuine miss from my end. I have now added service=parking_aisle as per your suggestion. Thanks for looking into my edits. Happy to learn from you.
Regards,
priymose

Hi,Apologies for the misinterpretation. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion. Regards, priymose

Hi,
Thanks for checking my edits.I have adjusted the building feature based on Esri world imagery as the neighboring features look aligned as per the same. Apologies for the miss from my end on adjustment of the symmetry. I have made the modifications as per your suggestion by using the Offset of (2.57,0) and NRW Ortho Imagery. Please find the changeset (105072473) for your reference. Please feel-free to suggest any modifications we are always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
priymose

Hi Skyper,
Thanks for checking my edit and providing your valuable feedback. I have misinterpreted the segment and gate based on obstruction visible on Maxar imagery. I genuinely apologize for the miss from our end. I have modified the geometry as per Bing aerial imagery, removed gate and private access as there is no proper evidence. I will make sure to take this learning in my future edits and verify all the available resources. Please find the changeset(104971866) of the same.
Thanks

thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, i have misinterpreted and created a service road. thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to avoid such edits in future. always happy to learn from the community

Hi Phil,
I have added the service road but did not add any access as there is no overlays or gate present to confirm the access. But, yes as rightly said by you it is leading to school and also all the other roads added are tagged private. Hence, it makes complete sense to add private access. I have made the edit as per your suggestion- Changeset:9542495 . Always Happy to learn from the community.
Regards.

Hi Holger,
Thanks for looking into our edits. I Apologise for the miss from my end. I have added the service road as it is leading to multiple entities but missed verifying the pavement and the type. Thanks for the correcting my edits. Yes, as you have mention the right entry should be through the service road that you have added. Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,priymose

Hi SomeoneElse,
looks like i have used offset feature to trace the road but missed checking the vicinity and setting the offset perfectly. Thanks for looking into my edit. will implement this learning in my future edits.

thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have mistakenly modified the access tag. thanks for the heads-up, please find the changeset/714999114 for the reverted edits. going forward, i will make sure to perform the edits much more carefully. always happy to learn from the community"

Thanks for your time for checking into our edits. We have created the service road based on the available resources and unable to validate the stream with our resources. We are not sure of making edits without supporting ground data. Please find the changest() for the suggested modifications. Do let us know that if we can go ahead and add the bridge in our future edits based on the existing streams. always happy to learn from the community

Hi ndm,
Thanks for making changes to the edit. I have used a different imagery while making the edit. I will consider this and will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
priymose.

Hi Acarlotti & Thomas Jarvis,

Thanks for looking into my edit. Please let me know if any changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
priymose.

Hi Acarlotti,

Thanks for looking into my edit. I don't have the latest evidence as mentioned above. Hence reverted the changeset. Please refer the changeset (78919543) for the modification done. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
priymose.

Hi JezCrow,

Thanks for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I understand the mistake now and will be more careful going forward. I have made changes to the segment, refer change set #: 75508226. Please let me know for any other changes as per local knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
priymose.