Hi Gentrification,
I came across your edits and notices you have added a random building when it is clearly not seen on the imagery. Please add only those data which are seen on the imagery and is valuable to the map. I have reverted the change. Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy mapping!
Best,
Poornima

Hi Bomin Kim,
I came across your changeset and noticed you have added a church over a school building. Can you please confirm which one is the correct building? Also, it would be great if you remove the wrong building from the map. Thanks!
Best,
Poornima

Hi MagnusHeart,
I came across your edits and noticed you deleted a building visible in the imagery. Can you please explain why was that building deleted? It's clearly seen in the imagery. I have reverted your changes and added that building again. Please be careful while editing and do not unnecessarily delete the features that is seen on the imagery. If you are deleting then a valid reason of why that edit was made would be very helpful for everyone to understand. Thank you and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy Mapping :)
Best,
Poornima

Hi Raj Krishnan,
I came across your changeset and noticed that the building was made circular, which was then overlapping a lot of other buildings and roads. Please make sure that when you are adding or editing buildings, they are matching according to the imagery. In case you are referring to another imagery, mention that in the source. Since you have used Bing, it is very clearly seen that there is no circular building. Was this by accident? I have reverted your changes and edited it according to the imagery. Please be careful when you are editing on OSM and make sure you are not uploading wrong data. Thank you!
Best regards,
Poornima

HI Andy,
Thanks for the clarification. I checked around to see if there are any other concrete sources but couldn't find any. I agree that may be the version 24 remains the best compromise on names. I will go ahead and change the name to how it was in your changeset.
Thanks again.
Best,
Poornima

Hi Andy,
When I came across this changeset and searched for the name Agdara, a wikipedia entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghdara_(town) had two names for the same place: Aghdara and Mertakert. That's why I added the alt name tag. Wasn't aware that this town was always referred to as Mertakert. Thanks for letting me know. I will revert my changeset and the previous one to how it was before. Thanks again.
Best,
Poornima

Hi 琅琊邢氏,
I came across your edits and noticed you have deleted the wikidata tag for the town Nanxun. It would be great to know the particular reason why the wikidata tag was deleted. Thanks.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

Hi madjidf,
I came across your edits and noticed you have deleted a name:ja tag. Usually the multilingual tags are added to aid in translation purposes and for tourism or other language maps. Is there any reason of deleting the tags? Please revert the change. Thanks.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

Hi Chickennuggets620,
I came across your edits and noticed you have been adding test data and sample edits on OSM and deleting it later. If you are testing data, please use the dev server and do not directly add onto OpenStreetMap. Thank you.
Best,
Poornima

Hi,
I think there are tags for indicating steepness. It's either highway=steep or highway=incline. You can add those tags if you need to indicate the steepness of the trial. Incline=up/down also works.
Poornima

Hi,
I came across your edits and noticed you have named footways as dirt and steepdirt>> etc. Please note the name tags are meant for adding proper names of the features. You can always use surface tag to describe what is the surface of the roads. I have deleted those name tags from the features. If you think dirt surface tag needs to be added, you can add that surface=* tag on OSM.
Best,
Poornima

Hi,
Yeah, please revert the changes. But it can be added again with a source compatible with OSM or by doing a field survey :) Thanks.

HI,
Thanks for the clarification.

Poornima

Hi Cartojo,
Just wanted to ask why was the road (way id: 174955286) deleted even though it is visible in the imagery. It mentioned: construction. Just asking to clarify whether that road isnt present anymore or are there any other changes. Thanks!
best,
Poornima

TheSwavu :)

Hi Alexis,
I came across your edits and noticed you have mentioned Google as a source. Please note Google cannot be the source while mapping on OSM. Please do not map anything on OSM if you are using google as a source. Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy Mapping :)
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

Hi Maci5741,
I came across your edits and noticed you have added leisure=park tags for all the nodes and also natural=water for swimming pools. Please refer to the correct way of tagging features on OSM before you map. Here's a guide to help you: osm.wiki/Tags. Leisure=park tags are added to a polygon and not on nodes and swimming pools are tagged as leisure=swimming_pool and not natural=water. It is always good to recheck before adding the features on OSM. Happy Mapping :)
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

Hi,
I guess this does sound like a ditch or a drainage pipe. tagging it that way would be appropriate. It would also be great to trace it according to the imagery. Thanks for taking a look at it.
Best,
Poornima

Also deleting the tag service=parking_aisle because the roads were for a fuel station.

Fixed here: changeset/47079819