OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
45241754 almost 9 years ago

Hi Bahromigamberdiev,
I came across your edits and noticed you have added around 80 hospitals in the neighbourhood and named it like Sam.Kush.Mayintepa KVP3 which sounds invalid. Clearly 80 hospitals is a large number, also these names are not acceptable. It would be great if you could explain why you added so many hospitals with such names. Also, please revert the changeset or delete the unwanted features.

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45183735 almost 9 years ago

Hi ParsiKade,
I had to revert your changeset/45184038 to retrieve deleted highways. Please be more careful when you are editing next time and take enough care that you dont delete existing valuable data from the map.

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

44613634 almost 9 years ago

Hi DeoB,
I came across your edits and noticed you have added artwork tag to traffic signals and other totally unrelated pois. Please note artwork tags are not to be used for anything other than famous art related stuff like sculptures, murals, wall paintings etc. Please change the tags of the all the things to the tags that are relevant or revert this changeset. For more info on tagging, please refer this: osm.wiki/Tags

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

44699685 almost 9 years ago

Hi احمدان,
I came across your edits and noticed that you have added a number of attraction tags and added personal names to them. Please note that the attraction tags are only meant for tourism related tags and not to be used for any other pois. Please revert this changeset or delete the unwanted attraction tags. For more info on tagging on osm, refer to this: osm.wiki/Tags

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45155977 almost 9 years ago

Hi Haley,
I came across your edits and noticed you have added multiple bus stops at the same place and a couple of them have tags like house 13 etc. Please note, bus stop tags are only for bus stops and not to be used for anything else. Clearly, this is a wrong usage of tagging. Refer to osm.wiki/Tags for more information of what tags to use where. Also, please revert and delete all these unnecessary bus stops.

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45030159 almost 9 years ago

Hi,
I came across your edits and noticed you have added 60 attractions along the main roads and named it formula 1. Please note multiple entries of the same thing are not necessary and also, attraction tags are only meant for tourism related pois and not for formula 1. Can you please revert the changes and remove the unnecessary pois?
Thanks,

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45148541 almost 9 years ago

Hi TheOutpost,
I came across your edits and noticed the deletions of the state park edits under this comment: Remove all Alaska State parks using copyrighted data as requested by AlaskaDave. It would be great if you could explain what copyrighted data you were referring to and why were the ways deleted?
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45095815 almost 9 years ago

Hi arcth,
I came across your edits and noticed a lot of nodes having building=yes tags and quite a few buildings being deleted. It would be if you could explain why a couple were deleted. Also, adding building=yes tags on nodes is wrong. It should only be added to the polygon/way and not on nodes.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45121116 almost 9 years ago

Hi Lubomir Geci,
I came across your edits and noticed you have changed the tag of a primary highway to a residential road. What was the need of this change, can you please explain? The changeset comment doesnt have na explanation of why this change was made and it is unwise to edit the tags of a major road without a concrete reason. Can you please explain the reason of this change or revert your changes to turn that road back to primary?
Also, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy Mapping :)
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

45065592 almost 9 years ago

Hi DoodleBob,
I came across your edits and noticed you have changed the tag and deleted the name of this road: way/459186756/history. Can you please give an explanation behind deleting the name tag? Changeset's comment is not exactly explaining the reason behind this.
Thanks!
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

38918801 almost 9 years ago

Done :)

38918801 almost 9 years ago

Corrected it. changeset/45049945
I hope this is right :)
Thanks again.
Poorni

38918801 almost 9 years ago

Ah shoot. Sorry and thanks again. Checking and correcting it

38918801 almost 9 years ago

Also, had added one of the destination tags to the right way. https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/17887418/21805809/24533672-d75c-11e6-8758-1956ae86fc24.png
Guess I mistook the other exit to be also leading to the same place and added that. Corrected it. Thanks

38918801 almost 9 years ago

Hi rickmastfan67,
Thank you so much for bringing this issue to my notice. I verified and found that you were correct :) I must have gotten confused with US 422 ref number added the destination tag to this motorway junction instead of the exit 15 of James E Ross Highway. Immediately correcting it. The sources used are: http://crosscountryroads.com/photos/pennsylvania/pa-i376eb.html
http://www.pahighways.com/exits/I376exits.html
Verified through a mapillary photo: https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/17887418/21805692/898bd25c-d75b-11e6-978b-7bbb3e0d4e76.png

Thanks once again. Changing it immediately.

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

44869998 almost 9 years ago

Hi,
Thanks for bringing this to my notice. A few of them were wrongly added by me. I was sorting that out. Will check the ones that were added by mistake and remove it.

44851322 almost 9 years ago

Hi Mapiando,
I came across your edits and noticed you have deleted a stream added by another mapper and added another stream which is incomplete, next to it. May I please know the reason of this change? Your changeset comment doesn't explain why you did this and it is not advisable to delete other mappers work without a solid reason. Please explain why you deleted or revert the changes you have done.
Happy Mapping!

Best,
Poornima Badrinath

43114756 about 9 years ago

Hi Luschi,
Thank you for bringing this to my notice. I remember clearly to have deleted only the address points that had the attraction tag as it is wrong to add addresses as attractions. If the fuel stations have been deleted, I apologise. It must have been when filtering the few points out. I will keep this in mind and comment on the changesets and then take the next actions required. Thanks again. Apologies for deleting useful data.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath

44106325 about 9 years ago

Wrong Changeset Comment. Sorry.
The actual changeset comment is updating turn restrictions in LA using Mapillary.

44106305 about 9 years ago

Wrong Changeset Comment. Sorry.
The actual changeset comment is updating turn restrictions in LA using Mapillary.