OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
44627468 almost 9 years ago

You've tagged way/412853612 as being part of Burns Bog reserve, but it's already part of the way/24625243 reserve. Is this a case of two similarly named reserves making up what everyone calls burns bog, or might there be a mistake with overlapping data?

44588516 almost 9 years ago

Hi,

What edits were you making to restrictions? "editing restriction" is a bit vauge, which makes it harder for others to tell what you're doing

44626529 almost 9 years ago

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's good to see more people mapping in suburban areas.

In OSM we only use the name field for names, not descriptions. I've changed the community garden to be tagged as a community garden object, so I also removed the name.

I'm wondering, is the name of this foot path Brookside Foot Path, or is that just a description?

41803382 almost 9 years ago

When I was last here, the road was oneway. Has this changed?

44520978 about 9 years ago

Hi,

Welcome back to OpenStreetMap after a long break!

When saving your changes, it would be good to used a changeset comment that concisely and adequately describes what you did. You can read more about changeset comments at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

And, welcome back

Paul

43544541 about 9 years ago

The Wikipedia article should probably link to the sub-section, but that article does cover that place.

What I'm wondering is why the source=knowledge if you're just following wikipedia tags?

43544541 about 9 years ago

You've added a wikidata tag to node/1065075386/history. Why is it https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3132987 instead of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17519561?

43723422 about 9 years ago

You seem to have deleted a bunch of stuff here, did you do this by mistake?

43526243 about 9 years ago

Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It's good to see another user in BC.

I was wondering, is this location somewhere customers can go to? It looks like a residential area.

17181332 over 9 years ago

It looks like there's some overlapping data with way/232040120

41617570 over 9 years ago

Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes Google, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Are there any other changesets from other unpermitted sources?

你好,在OSM你不能未经允许拷贝有版权的地图,比如你拷贝的谷歌地图。继续这样拷贝会被永久封停。我必须移除这些拷贝数据。还有其他未经允许的任何更改吗

Paul Norman

For the OSM Data Working Group

41379241 over 9 years ago

Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes Google, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Are there any other changesets from other unpermitted sources?

你好,在OSM你不能未经允许拷贝有版权的地图,比如你拷贝的谷歌地图。继续这样拷贝会被永久封停。我必须移除这些拷贝数据。还有其他未经允许的任何更改吗

Paul Norman

For the OSM Data Working Group

41524625 over 9 years ago

Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes Google, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Are there any other changesets from other unpermitted sources?

你好,在OSM你不能未经允许拷贝有版权的地图,比如你拷贝的谷歌地图。继续这样拷贝会被永久封停。我必须移除这些拷贝数据。还有其他未经允许的任何更改吗

Paul Norman

For the OSM Data Working Group

41840637 over 9 years ago

Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes Google, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Are there any other changesets from other unpermitted sources?

你好,在OSM你不能未经允许拷贝有版权的地图,比如你拷贝的谷歌地图。继续这样拷贝会被永久封停。我必须移除这些拷贝数据。还有其他未经允许的任何更改吗

Paul Norman

For the OSM Data Working Group

38211685 over 9 years ago

I've fixed up the tagging of way/23499881 a bit. exit 19 isn't a destination ref, it's the ref of the highway=motorway_junction nearby. Also, I expanded the road name.

41187225 over 9 years ago

That restriction is at the lights to the east of this way, where the bridlepath comes to the road. It doesn't apply to traffic coming via 41st. andrewpmk was right in what the sign is, but you've applied it at the wrong place.

41187225 over 9 years ago

Is relation/6453103 a new sign? I haven't been out to UBC in a couple months, but I'm pretty sure going along W 41st, SW Marine, and then Camosun was allowed.

41479348 over 9 years ago

There's been some discussion about this data in note/677611 - could you add a comment over there?

41096797 over 9 years ago

You've uploaded a bunch of nodes but there doesn't seem to be a way here

39700942 over 9 years ago

When something is closed or demolished, it's best to delete it.