OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58637763 over 7 years ago

Hello,

I saw on way/585330001 that you added the tag project=OpenSidewalks. You shouldn't add tags like this, just tags that describe the real-world properties of the sidewalk

48279264 over 7 years ago

Hello,

Vancouver is a city, not a tourist attraction. It's already mapped. I've reverted your change.

46181028 over 7 years ago

Hello,

did they re-paint the road? Last I checked, this was a one-way road.

54474749 almost 8 years ago

test discussion comment

52639022 almost 8 years ago

Hello,

I'm wondering what you used for reclassifying the roads in New West

45779719 almost 8 years ago

I've rejoined some ways that shouldn't have been split because there was no need for them to be split.

11246736 almost 8 years ago

Hello,

A user is claiming that the loop around Metchosin Mountain (e.g. way/276922437) is private access. I was wondering if you remembered anything from when you mapped it a few years ago.

Thanks,

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group

21922507 almost 8 years ago

Hello,

A user is claiming that the loop around Metchosin Mountain (e.g. way/276922437) is private access. I was wondering if you remembered anything from when you mapped it a few years ago.

Thanks,

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group

52898775 about 8 years ago

Hello,

For some reason, you've created a huge changeset that spans from Africa to Asia. Was there anything odd that you were doing?

Also, I noticed that some buildings like way/532298735 are traced on top of other buildings, which is an error. Do you need help fixing these?

52947025 about 8 years ago

Hello,

Wit this upload you seem to have duplicated

changeset/52533184 changeset/52975466 changeset/52974598 changeset/52945321

22714814 about 8 years ago

Hello,

this changeset seems to have added non-English names as name:en, e.g. node/2897172697

Also, I can't see any information about the license of the data on wikiloc.com, just a (C) 老瓦 All rights reserved. Where's the license found?

45848154 about 8 years ago

You've misinterpreted that, that is about splitting the way at the intersection which is required, not splits like this.

45848154 about 8 years ago

All editors handle way splits correctly, and if any didn't, it would be an editor bug. I've rejoined the ways at 49th and Granville, could you handle any others?

I also saw that when you split stuff one way ended up in relations twice

45848154 about 8 years ago

Ways can't be too long for adding a restriction.

45848154 about 8 years ago

Hello,
I'm wondering why you split way/472477000 into its own way. I can't see any reason to do so, and any relations on it didn't need it split.

46241741 about 8 years ago

Do you mean relation/6951615? There's no reason to split the way to add that.

51914956 about 8 years ago

So it is an import?

Those terms are the license you've got the data under?

51914956 about 8 years ago

Hello,

I was looking for some information on this source. Is it an import?

52373207 about 8 years ago

Is the stream direction for way/527730240 right? As it goes along it gets smaller and smaller, I'd have thought it was flowing to the southwest.

52320290 about 8 years ago

Living streets here surprises me since they're normally used where there are traffic problems - are you sure they're not residential roads or service roads?