pkoby's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171099808 | 4 months ago | I adjusted the boundary to match the official park boundary per MontCo's parcels. I looked at the parcel map and it seems that the weirdness along the west side is due to the Pennypack Trail still being in a parcel of a railroad right-of-way, so the park fills some of that in, but isn't officially in that area. |
| 169636799 | 5 months ago | Thanks for catching that! It's a Linux command to show a list of peripherals to a computer. I'm not sure how it got transferred into here... |
| 166413778 | 7 months ago | I'm sorry, I must have mistaken this for a different one I took recently. I have taken this trail before, but I think it may have been last summer... Apologies for my impulsive revert and comment. |
| 166413778 | 7 months ago | This isn't closed, I walked the length of it 22 days ago, and it's certainly not blocked. That's why I added it. |
| 165617154 | 8 months ago | I'm not familiar with the source you used, but I'm not sure it's copyright-legal to copy information from it. Same with Parkopedia on another of your changesets. |
| 163964664 | 9 months ago | That's an error artifact from me keeping track of progress. I will fix that. |
| 163708165 | 9 months ago | Hello, I removed bicycle=designated because the paths are tagged with highway=cycleway, which as the wiki says, "implies bicycle=designated" (highway=cycleway), so it's basically redundant. I'm not sure why iD thinks that's an error. The way they're tagged now means it's a shared use path, but it could also be tagged with highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated and mean the same thing. I'm not local to the area, but the county database of bicycle infrastructure labels these as Shared Use Paths, so unless labeled differently on-site, they seem to be for both foot and bike. |
| 161402791 | 11 months ago | I know I saw some discussion about removing place tags from boundaries, but I can't find it. Do you have a reference so I can familiarize myself? I got confused when my Overpass queries stopped displaying as expected... |
| 160086614 | about 1 year ago | Hi, thanks for the edits, but I noticed you removed the 'height' tag when adding 'building:levels'. I recommend leaving 'height' alone, because both tags can coexist. I have readded the 'height' values for this changeset. |
| 158465165 | about 1 year ago | I checked the Friends of Wissahickon rules, and they do specifically state that one should stick to designated trails. Therefore, I just went through and tagged all informal trails with `access=no` to really drive the point home. Other maps/sites should respect that more than the `informal=yes` tag. |