OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114718055 about 4 years ago

Danke schön, das war schnell! :)

112001988 about 4 years ago

Macht Sinn, ich war auch selber nicht so sicher…

83094166 about 5 years ago

Concernant le nœud node/7368671692, est-ce la manière canonique d'indiquer un endroit où on peut se faire tester pour le coronavirus ? Je cherche des discussions à ce sujet sans grand succès…

85444092 over 5 years ago

C'est effectivement un problème, puisque l'attribut "place=city" rend ce point très visible. Je le supprime pour résoudre ce problème.

13836115 over 5 years ago

à propos de la déchetterie sur laquelle vous avez ajouté une note: way/173900228
Non, il n'y a plus aucune incinération sur place depuis des années: d'ailleurs ce n'est pas une décharge mais une déchetterie

85681170 over 5 years ago

Merci!

84972099 over 5 years ago

Hmm, c'est curieux - le calque devait être activé dans JOSM, sans être affiché évidemment !

71710737 over 6 years ago

Many thanks for this lightning-fast solution! Have a great day!

62093579 over 7 years ago

hi! thanks for this. The road you have traced actually goes further and connects to the main road up north (I have cycled there yesterday and realized that this road was not on the map). I have updated this.

49632564 over 8 years ago

thanks a lot!

45803358 almost 9 years ago

that looks much better, thanks a lot!

45655862 almost 9 years ago

thanks a lot! do you mind if I refine the shape of the road with my GPS traces?
I think it currently goes too far to the West: you have probably been mislead by the shape of the building which was wrong in the first place. See note/859639

38391886 almost 9 years ago

Hi,
A one-way street now crosses the building you have drawn, from Oxpens road to Abbeyplace. I don't think the other street crossing the construction site is still running. See the note here:
note/859639
I think I need more surveying to be confident enough to fix this problem.

44963942 almost 9 years ago

ok yeah, that's what happened: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3192282124
sorry about that!

44963942 almost 9 years ago

Or it could be that the Wikidata ID was fixed before by someone else, but the wikidata-osm tool data was not updated so it still displayed the conflict…

44963942 almost 9 years ago

The id I removed on the shipwreck was https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q478353 , which indeed refers to the replica in Amsterdam, not the actual shipwreck!

So my edit was correct :-) But thank you for checking!

44963942 almost 9 years ago

If I'm not wrong the wikidata ID was that of its replica in Amsterdam, not the actual shipwreck… But I can't find the Wikidata ID I removed :-/. Anyway Q26674641 seems to be the right one, so let's add it.

For the Argos shop, it had wikidata ID https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q189901 , which is clearly wrong.

43503743 about 9 years ago

this has just been fixed by user trigpoint.

43503743 about 9 years ago

Hi,
Well, this changeset (the one we are commenting on, that you closed 18 days ago) includes many campsites, right?
Thanks,
pintoch

43503743 about 9 years ago

hi, thanks for your edit. Are you sure these are really campsites? How did you discover them?