OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
143646696 about 2 years ago

Bạn ơi edit kĩ lại tí. Các relation chỗ này khá phức tạp. Với mỗi khi bạn tách way_id hãy để riêng với việc edit cấm rẽ.

138086021 about 2 years ago

It's an open mapping platform, we include official information from the government in changeset comment, then we could do what we're doing.

138086021 about 2 years ago

Hi GrabVN_QThoai, you could do it like the work you did at Sư Vạn Hạnh street. Thanks in advance.

142703934 about 2 years ago

Please help check again relation/16056973,
If this turn restriction is outdated, please delete all members of it.

142700992 about 2 years ago

Hi GrabVN_QuanTan,
this relation/16056973 still miss "from" member. Please check again.

142641949 about 2 years ago

When you delete any way_id, please take a look carefully since it could be the part of a certain turn restriction.

142641949 about 2 years ago

Hi GrabVN_QuanTan, relation/16056974 is missing "to" member. Please check again. Thank you for your contribution.

142230820 about 2 years ago

Hi Linh, this relation relation/16479797 is very hard and complex to edit. Hope you and your team could discussed again. Image of version 1. https://imgur.com/a/2dcRtGp

142515096 about 2 years ago

Hi Grab_Cong, please consult your team to edit this complex no_u_turn. I can help you to list some kind of mistakes you've made in this 16479797 no_u_turn.
I suggest that next time, you should edit one by one turn restriction in a single changeset.
Here are some mistakes in 16479797 : 1. There are 2 "from" members ----- 2. There are 2 "to" members ----- 3. "via" members do not form a straight way ---- 4. "from" and "to" are connected at a node but there is a "via" way

139729386 about 2 years ago

Việt ơi, relation/16122632 là cấm oto rẽ từ Thanh Lãm ra Phố Xốm nhỉ?

138918307 about 2 years ago

Sorry this relation/16122632, the node should be marked as "via" and the relation itself miss "from" member.

138918307 about 2 years ago

Version 2 of relation/796720017 has been deleted by another user. Could you help to adjust this relation again since "from" member has been deleted? Thank you.

141979226 about 2 years ago

Hi vietnam321,
relation relation/16405060
with multiple restriction values
"from" member is a node undefined
"to" member is not a way undefined. Please check again

142088560 about 2 years ago

Please help me to check again this one. Is this a time-based no_left_turn for car or for motorcycle?

142344809 about 2 years ago

Got it. I changed from no left turn to no u turn. Thank you

142344809 about 2 years ago

Hi GrabVN_QThoai, in relation/16459647, did you mean time-based no_u_turn for car?

142096555 about 2 years ago

Sorry for express my anger. When you edit something, please write some more clarity description. This is good for you to remember what you did for any changeset.

142096555 about 2 years ago

You’re correct. Thank you for your contributions. Next time please clarify something like “delete outdated time-based turn restrictions for car due to new traffic signs have been placed”.

142096555 about 2 years ago

Hey, What's wrong with you GrabVN_QThoai?
Why you delete 23 time-based turn restrictions without any proof?

142345829 about 2 years ago

One more thing, please add bicycle as except, like motorcycle.