DigitalGlobe recently updated aerial imagery in the area, and it's insanely high quality. It does show the park in detail and surrounding houses under construction. In the iD editor go to background settings on the right side panel (3 stacks icon) and select "DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery". You need to zoom in high enough for the better imagery to appear or else it would be the same as the Bing imagery. I hope this helps!

DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery does show the wetland area in question. You can find it in the iD editor by clicking the "3 stacks" icon in the right side panel and selecting "DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery". Hope this helps!

Hi guys, just an update. At least a year ago, Madeline Steele in changeset/40072273 removed the yard/siding members from the relation. "trimet:auxiliary=WES" was added to those ways so they could be associated with WES. The relation is ready to be converted to public_transport v2 format. Just warning you guys in case that happens.

totally knew that, JOSM editing makes me forget about the language prefix. thanks for letting me know.

I remembered that their website was replaced with a notice regarding closure due to construction activity, but can't seem to find it now. But I found some social media posts about it.
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1049628695083477&id=173173612728994
https://www.reddit.com/r/camaswashington/comments/455d5a/green_mountain_golf_course_has_closed/

Traffic reporters and people around here aren't calling it the Minnesota Freeway anymore, just I-5. Worth tossing it into old_name. Minnesota Freeway isn't signed anywhere along that stretch. I could only see that name used in historical records. I have an answer with more detail in the OSM PDX mailing list.

All fixed. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I would not have known this, as this was the result of an edit conflict with myself in iD that I didn't realize.

Please be specific. Generally, I was modifying crossings and updating bike lane tagging in the area. Looking at it myself, N Vancouver Ave was duplicated. (what happens when you have 2 edit tabs...). I have partially fixed this, and will fix more later.

I'm concerned about the past couple of edits because you have made existing turn restrictions broken, like removing a street from relation/6272043/history. Is there any reason why this is happening, and how could you prevent that from happening again?

I noticed that the area for Powell Butte Nature Park got deleted in this changeset. Is there any reason for this? I feel that it should be back on the map.

Looking at Taginfo, Papa Murphy's itself is used 129 times, while this Take 'N' Bake variant has 41. It's possible to put the full name as an official_name value. I feel that simply using Papa Murphy's is simple enough. I would highly recommend a revert, but I'll leave it up to you.

Why mass change all these Papa Murphy's locations to the full name? I feel that simply 'Papa Murphy's' is fine, as it's more commonly said than the full name.

I am a bit troubled by the kinds of edits you're making. I appreciate that fact that you're adding turn lane data here, but you're adding the wrong data to most places. Example: way/5869287 has lanes=0, then lanes:forward=0 (but lanes:backward=2). Zero total lanes doesn't make sense. Do you understand how to add lane data appropriately?

meant to say "add details to shops." im tired of this

again, apologies for wrong changeset comment. I'm not used to the save and cancel buttons switched around in iD.

my apologies for my past couple of edits. I have accidentally clicked the save button instead of cancel. that's why a wrong changeset comment is used here.

The node is a separate Starbucks shop inside the CLSB. It is not the duplicate of the shop that's a way. If you enter the CLSB in the southeast, you'll see a separate Starbucks. Both of them are very close however.

I'm a bit concerned about mapping clinics and doctor's offices as areas around property. They are not rendered by Mapnik, and I'll bet it won't be rendered anywhere else. My suggestion is to simply put the amenity tags on the buildings themselves only.

the off-ramps are connected from the Marquam Bridge upper deck (layer 3). I changed the layers from 2 to 3 for that reason. if the layer of the off ramps is 2, then the map will look like the off-ramp is under the Marquam Bridge, which is not true.

Putting destination names as name values on motorway links is inappropriate. You can use two methods: the exit_to key (which put exit sign details on the exit number node, more at exit_to=*) or the destination key (which puts exit sign info on the ramp itself, more info at destination=*). Make sure you use the last sign showing the street name/exit number on I-84, not the street blade at the end of the ramp.