osmidal's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by osmidal
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4384524 | osmidal | Here are two sets of `highway=steps`. |
|||
| 4156179 | osmidal | Check if this really is _drinking_ water. I had to remove a drinking water node nearby, since it was a reservoir of standing water with organic debris in it. |
|||
| 4510639 | rik_ | Die Straße[1] auf der Brücke wurde mit `access=no` getagged – wie sieht es mit dem eingezeichneten Fußweg[2] aus? Ist dieser auch gesperrt? [1] way/60730195 [2] way/1187406279 |
|||
| 4315871 | osmidal | There is a automatic grocery store/ mini-supermarket "Teegut... teo" here. |
|||
| 3311340 | osmidal | Here is a barrier=fence fence_type=railing colour=gray material=metal on the west side of the cycle lane. via StreetComplete 45.2 |
|||
| 4018872 | osmidal | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" for node/3844737325 via StreetComplete 55.1: It is not a dedivated clock here, but a departure information display. Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4351818 | osmidal | The whole "ZEGG" area is tagged with `amenity=school`. But that seems really incorrect to me. It is an intentional community with private living spaces, worlshops, and which also hosts seminars. I suggest that a more proper tagging should be thought of; maybe just remove "amenity=school", and have some place tag (neighbourhood, hamlet, city block, ... -- I do not know what really fits here)? |
|||
| 4384542 | osmidal | The round terrace around the "Rundraum" building part should also be circular. |
|||
| 4369435 | osmidal | `building:place=yes` does seem to be a wrong tag for this area. See building:place=* |
|||
| 4369434 | osmidal | Many nodes of the building parts are not aligned on the multipoligon which actually should resemble the overall building. One example is exactly here; another one I have noticed to the left. Needs to be checked thoroughly and fixed. |