This isn't correct. The Alameda/MLK changes names when it crosses Codornices Creek; there's a street sign at the exact spot with both names. It was fine before.

You should really be discussing major classification changes first, especially when you only have 17 edits. The idea is generally to maintain a coherent interconnected network, and you've essentially introduced a "gap" in the secondary network with this Marin/Masonic/Solano/The Alameda/Hopkins/Gilman loop you made.

Hi. What is this "BWA map" you're basing these classification changes on? Why did you introduce this jog in the highway classification at Masonic Ave?
It looks strange, doesn't reflect actual traffic patterns, and is very similar to some undiscussed classification changes made by a now-banned user with multiple accounts from about a year ago.

Thank you for your response.

Each terminal currently has a single exit path from the airside area (inside security) to landside (outside security). For example, in Terminal 2 someone leaving the airport passes a sign stating "Beyond this point you must be rescreened" with a security officer stationed to stop people from re-entering, then passes through a series of automatic doors that only allow one-way travel towards the landside exit.

Similarly, there is only one path of travel from landside to airside in each terminal, which is through the security screening area. These are separate from the exits.

It's possible that your software is set up to block routing through the barrier=checkpoint nodes that represent the security screening areas by default.

Similarly, if you are using a quality-assurance tool it's possible that the path through customs and immigration will be incorrectly flagged as a dead-end one-way, since the international flight it originates from isn't mapped in osm.

Were all the "Private Property No Trespassing", "Private Street Not For Public Use", and "Private Property No Trespassing No Soliciting" signs taken down around these three complexes?

If so, these streets would still be access=permissive at best since they're privately owned.

Hi,
The oneway/oneway:foot tags that were removed here are important; you can't enter the secured areas through the exit (you can't even turn around half-way since the doors close automatically behind you), nor can you go backwards through customs/immigration. The escalators only go one direction as well.

Hi,
Please note that highway=corridor is an entirely appropriate tag to use on indoor corridors inside buildings. Please don't change it to highway=footway. Also, you moved one of the terminal 2 entrances to line-up with the covered walkway, which would make sense, but that's not how it's actually built. Some surface/covered tags were lost as well around the entrances.

Hi, just a heads up: it looks like some bus route relations got broken here near the Martinez Amtrak station.

Hi,
Thank you for your interest in adding bicycle infrastructure to the map. Unfortunately, this is not the way that on-street bike lanes are mapped in osm. They are generally mapped by adding the tag cycleway=lane (for bike lanes), or cycleway:right=lane / cycleway:left=lane / cycleway:both=lane to specify which side(s) of the street have lanes. Please take a look at cycleway=* and/or osm.wiki/Bicycle for more info. They're only drawn as a separate cycleway when there's some kind of significant physical separation from the roadway (like a bike lane going behind a bus boarding island for a common SF example), or in rare complicated situations where things can't be represented accurately otherwise.

The bike lanes on Folsom Street were already mapped, tagged as cycleway=lane.

Hi, welcome to OSM.

It looks like the 2-way bikeway /cycle track along Battery has already been mapped as a property of the street itself (see cycleway=*#Cycle_tracks for more info), and the way you drew is basically duplicating what's already on the map. You can get an idea of what bicycle infrastructure is already mapped by clicking on the layers button at the right side of the OSM website and looking at the "CyclOSM" or "Cycle Map" layers. CyclOSM is better but can be slow to load.

Hi, this track (and others like it) are already mapped as a multipolygon ( relation/7718577 in this case). It's not necessary to add leisure=track tags to the inner and outer ways as well.

For the denomination here I was going off of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eritrean_Orthodox_Tewahedo_Church

Is it actually correct to change this to "eritrean_orthodox"? I'm not an expert here, but these denomination names can sometimes be kind of sensitive.

"El Cerrito Plaza" is the name of the shopping center. The internal access roads and parking aisles don't have names.

highway=residential is also not an appropriate tag for these kinds of roads, which were already correctly tagged as highway=service.

Josm suddenly uploaded while I was typing the description. It should say:

Fixed inconsistent classification: Marin traffic doesn't divert onto Masonic, which is a fairly minor local street, whereas Marin is a major through route.

The tag you removed here and in the other changesets doesn't actually mean "motor vehicles are not allowed in the HOV lane", because it's modified by the other more specific hov=designated tag. Before this edit the tagging really meant that the only motor vehicles allowed are HOVs. Now the tagging implies that all motor vehicles are allowed, regardless of whether they are high-occupancy vehicles. In reality this is signed as "carpools only".

Hi joeeeew,
What's the deal with these two hardware stores you added on what look like ordinary houses? One of them is tagged as a Home Depot...

Hi BorjaMeep,
I've been to this station a few times, and don't recall there being a long corridor here.

Hi Alee11,

The campus has already been mapped at a much higher level of accuracy/detail than what you added. Unfortunately I had to revert your changeset. I would encourage you to look at what has already been mapped and add details to the existing data rather than trying to draw on top of it.

Hi Ganesh, none of the toll=yes tags you added around the Bay Area across several changesets were correct, as far as I can tell. You might want to double-check your other edits.

(Fyi, the bridges across San Francisco Bay are only tolled in one direction; there's no eastbound toll.)

It *is* specifically designed for pedestrians.

This was still here about 5 hours ago...