OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
117066973 almost 4 years ago

I 'll leave to MSFT editorial team to sort out.

117066973 almost 4 years ago

Hi
there are a lot of untagged points in this changeset. Also some of the address (lot numbers ?) in Lucknow Park have been deleted. Waste bins near the sports grounds in the school have been deleted - have they been removed or maybe replaced by plastic wheely bins.

116895278 almost 4 years ago

One option would be to join the openstreetmap.org talk-au mailing list and raise and discuss the problem there.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
If you do not wish to discuss publicly and need assistance to resolve a problem you could contact the openstreetmap.org data working group
osm.wiki/Data_working_group

116887637 almost 4 years ago

Another alternative …tag as amenity=doctors plus healthcare:speciality=orthodontics

Wiki description of clinics seems very varied

116887637 almost 4 years ago

Have you considered that this may be tagged a clinic instead of a hospital. ‘Clinic’ forms part of the name. The healthcare section of the wiki is very extensive and mentions orthodontist practices.

116702249 almost 4 years ago

I am happy to encourage you to map the local environs. cheers.

116702249 almost 4 years ago

The building site should probably be also tagged with landuse=construction
You can also add construction=xyz to further describe the type of construction, though I think naming it Building Site does no harm. Others may disagree.
construction=*

Naming guide:
osm.wiki/Naming_conventions

116702249 almost 4 years ago

Hi
I think that changing the name from Bunbury Centre Point to Bunbury Centre Point Shopping Centre was a misstep. There is already a tag specifically designating it to be a shopping mall and the company web site doesn’t include any more than Bunbury Centre Point in it’s title.
I expect that if you check other big shopping malls that very few mappers would feel the need to add ‘Shopping Centre’ or similar to the name, though I haven’t checked. Never the less, despite my protest, I am happy for you to name it as you please as you are likely a local mapper.

97230439 almost 4 years ago

Hi
these (in blue) still have errors 12 months down the track.
Should we delete them now?
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.56278&lat=-36.39992&zoom=12

116584292 almost 4 years ago

I think Strava will pick up the change eventually in it's navigation apps.
On this page, using the 'find directions' tab, both OSM and GraphHopper uses the way for bicycle navigation.
History shows the way was originally highway=footway but it was changed to highway=cycleway 5 months ago, so maybe Strava rely on their own users or other sourced data before routing via the path.
You could mention it to Strava directly or via their forum. Maybe their maps are overdue for an update.
Cheers.

116584292 almost 4 years ago

Never mind the question…I guess the editor you use just offers all these boxes to fill in for each element.
In this edit you are indicating there is no incline in the way.

116584292 almost 4 years ago

Hi
What is the meaning of and why are you adding this tag…
incline = -0%

116520175 almost 4 years ago

Thanks Guy.
Nev

116514898 almost 4 years ago

Also, we generally only name roads that have a sign posted name. This seems to be a road without a name to me.
There is a section here on street names.
osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

116514898 almost 4 years ago

Hi
I was wondering if the tag highway=track would be more suitable for the road you added as the others it links to are tagged as tracks. Also the end of the road joins to an admin boundary. It is best not to join to those. There appears to be a continuation of the road along the admin boundary to join another track and then extends further south. My only concern is if the part you have mapped would be better tagged as a track.
highway=*
highway=track

116520175 almost 4 years ago

Another tag that could be used is 'informal'
informal=*

116520175 almost 4 years ago

Hi
You deleted many remote hiking ways, some of which were recently added by the mappers through survey.
Instead of being deleted it would be likely be better to discuss with the mappers first or change the characteristics of the tags using description, visibility, etc, or adding lifecycle tags like disused:highway, etc. so that other more adventurous hikers can use the mapped ways.
trail_visibility=*
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

81151064 almost 4 years ago

Hi
FYI, a few of the tracks you surveyed have been deleted.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=116520175
Was wondering if you think instead of being deleted it would be better to change the characteristics of the tags using visibility, etc, or adding disused:highway, etc. so that other more adventurous hikers can use they mapped ways.

116454128 almost 4 years ago

Hi
road names are not abbreviated in OSM.
osm.wiki/Naming_conventions
I have fixed your edits.

116410924 almost 4 years ago

Hi
this edit have been reverted