From the website listed I believe this is only a PO address and will be deleted.
PO BOX 293 Cherrybrook Sydney NSW 2126

Please moved your business location off the roadway and onto the physical location where your business is located. I don't see any land along Cherrybrook Chase that is likely to be #293. Only businesses that have a shopfront at the place where you have mapped should be mapped.

Please remove the business phone number from the name. It is meant to be the name only. You already have the phone number listed.

You need to shift the Elegant Smiles dentistry clinic info from the roadway node to the actual building position it occupies, preferably by mapping the building shape too.

Name is for name only. Leave phone # in the phone tag only.

I also added a gate at each end of the fire trail

I notice the fire trail is well depicted by Stava users so may be accessible to hikers and mountain bike riders.

That looks better to me, Thanks.
I added a few more tags based on your description and it now renders ok. Regards
Nev

It would have been better to not delete the track and instead add tags to indicate access type and other tags to indicate condition and steepness.

Removed Shuttlemate Airport Transfers & Tours as it appears to have no physical location in Palmwoods for customers to attend. See their website: http://www.shuttlemate.com.au

http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

There is a tool in iD for squaring the buildings and will make all the angles = 90 degrees.

There is no point in adding this to the OpenStreetMap if you do not have a physical building location to map the details to. The OSM is not a business directory. If you do not have a physical address point where your business is located then Google Maps is the best solution for you needs.

You need to locate this a your physical business address to use on the OpenStreetMap.
Also please use the documented syntacs for the opening hours.

Hi Benny
I had a look in Josm, then reverted the changeset, then used the JOSM Validator on the polygon and found the problem was at this position…

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kbk3wkhox14hzz/self%20intersect.png?dl=0

I then un-did the revert (back to what Map Roulette did to it) and saw that Map Roulette split off that small polygon and converted the 2 polygons into a multipolygon, which seems the best way map things that have seperate polygon bits. I think a few other small polygons could also be treated in the same way. If you zoom in really close on those you can see that they don’t intersect and have a small gap between the lines so that the Map Roulette routine did not detect an error.

I have not saved anything doing this so all should be ok.

regards
Nev

Mate, that's too long ago for me to remember. You can put them duplicate segments back if you wish :)
Greetings for Christmas and New Year.

This changeset was placed on a roadway node so have reverted it. You need to place it on the building outline that it occupies.

DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery is more recent than Bing in this area.

Reverted Changeset: 54021439 as no physical business presence on the ground evident or mapped and no response from original mapper.

I now agree with the deletion of the proposed Melbourne Airport Railway Line until the proposal is more defined. Seems even the route is not decided or the time frame from my reading though I am not a local.