I updated the multipolygon

Hi, osmi has identified problems with the wetland multipolygon
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.79944&lat=-16.96466&zoom=13
I suggest you use the Josm editor for multipolygons

….and is clearly visible on Esri imagery

There is no evidence of a hotel here.

The mapping updates the osm database immediately but the rendering of the map takes longer, with the standard layer sometimes taking a few minutes to a day or so. Refreshing or clearing the cache on your browser may help (control+r for me and control+ f5 for some). Other upstream caches may be the cause delays - my phone takes a very long time even after clearing the cache.
Another way to see the latest is to copy the url from your browser and paste in a tor browser which is unlikely to be caching part of the map tiles for your area.

I think it is all mapped fine, thanks

Hi, I disconnected your new cycleway from an underground powerline. Are you able to check if there are cycle lanes on West St between Church St and the Pacific Hwy as the new cycleway you added probably links to the cycleway or lanes on the Pacific Hwy here.

Hi, I disconnected your new cycleway from an underground powerline. Are you able to check if for cycle lanes on West St between Church St and the Pacific Hwy as the new cycleway you added probably links to the cycleway or lanes on the Pacific Hwy here.

no response. Company does not occupy all floors of building...reverted

Hi
the name= tag is not used for street numbers
Please use the addr tags instead
addr:*=*

This link may be better
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.09013&lat=-27.66776&zoom=14

Hi
I noticed osmi picked up errors in the Berrinba Wetlands.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.08083&lat=-27.66922&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi, it is expected that you trace the outline of the houses, not the property boundaries. If you want to map the property boundaries then map the fence lines instead. The address details are added to the main building foot print.

Hi
when you don't own and operate all spaces of the building, you need to add your business details to a separate node within the building footprint

Hi, if the bridge on Watson Ave and the parts of Watsons and Beare Avenues that it joins are now complete you can change the tag highway=construction to highway=residential.
I also would have expected, if completed, that Watson Avenue and Beare Avenue now change names near the bridge junction. If so, you need to split the small section of newly completed road near the bridge junction and fix the names.

No response, unable to verify…deleted

Hi
is Powergate Australia the name of the building at 44 Market St, or is the company located on particular floors?
You should instead add a node within the the building footprint and add all the company details to the node instead of the building using their website
https://powergateaustralia.com.au/contact-us/

Hi
The format for addr:street is incorrect…please review the addr tag to fix

Oh, i had already fixed…should have been more clear. I’ll update to the latest dataset later then. Cheers

Hi
should the addr:street be Little Collins Street instead?