Another method is to add noname=yes
noname=*

Hi
We normally only give tracks and paths names if the are named. If unnamed it is best left without the name tag. You could add a note=your_text tag if you think other mappers need to know you have confirmed it is unnamed.

Hi
There is no need to delete private tracks. Instead just add the tag access=private.
It is useful to know about tracks that cross your path and in emergency situations it may become more important to know the details of tracks and paths in the vicinity.

Hi
welcome to the OpenStreetMap.
The name tag is only for things that really have a name not for the residents name.
I have removed the name.
name=*

Polygons removed ...
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=91168592

Hi
welcome to the OpenStreetMap.
Boundaries for political letterbox pamphlet campaigns are not suitable for inclusion in the OpenStreetMap.
Please use something more suitable such as Umap
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
I will remove your edits for the letterbox drops.

Hi
Regarding “Satellite imagery is very old”, you are not restricted to using Bing imagery. You may find other imagery available in iD is more up to date.

Qld Topo has the street name change the same as osm about where the creek crossing is.
Tks

Hi
looks like a few problems for you to sort out near Noosa in this changeset.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10313&lat=-26.37959&zoom=16

Hi Grahame80
I noticed an accidentally shifted road node connected to a stream ( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91026578 ). I have shifted it back to where it belongs. Can you check if it all looks ok, thanks.

Looks good with correct tagging.

@aharvey, I have reverted my changesets, returning to state of last Dimity edit

Ok. I will revert my changeset. I was not comfortable abusing the name tag further anyway.
Can I leave you to do your preferred changes because I’m not familiar with traffic sign tagging.

Hi
I made a small stub of the path to the block visible and changed the wording of the sign name to make the situation clearer (hopefully)

Hi Dimity
This note is not on the path leading to Burning Palms so unable to interfere with routers.
I have used this router to route along the pathhttps://www.alltrails.com/explore/map/map-91e8299--44
I was able to route by hiking using Gaia too.
The path to Burning Palms appears to be tagged correctly for hiking but is not suitable for cycling.
In view of what you have said, I have re-instated the sign info as before which relates to a different path to keep the OpenStreetMap.org database correct.

Hi Dimity
has this track to the figure of Eight Pools been re-opened? Has the block been removed too?
Do the tags associated with these need updating?
way/384742094
node/5006677508

I simplified the area by mapping a simple polygon along Paynter Creek tagged with waterway=riverbank and same with the smaller adjoining creek. This is in common with other waterways nearby.
Multipolygons are not required here.

Hi
this is complicated and needs fixing.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.03383&lat=-26.63634&zoom=17
Do you want me to fix and/or simplify.

Previous just for info.
Cheers

Hi Joris
From the Australian tagging guidelines
osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Bush_Walking_and_Cycling_Tracks