OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55207289 almost 8 years ago

Please remove the business phone number from the name. It is meant to be the name only. You already have the phone number listed.

55146091 almost 8 years ago

You need to shift the Elegant Smiles dentistry clinic info from the roadway node to the actual building position it occupies, preferably by mapping the building shape too.

55120773 almost 8 years ago

Name is for name only. Leave phone # in the phone tag only.

55092901 almost 8 years ago

I also added a gate at each end of the fire trail

55092901 almost 8 years ago

I notice the fire trail is well depicted by Stava users so may be accessible to hikers and mountain bike riders.

55092901 almost 8 years ago

That looks better to me, Thanks.
I added a few more tags based on your description and it now renders ok. Regards
Nev

55092901 almost 8 years ago

It would have been better to not delete the track and instead add tags to indicate access type and other tags to indicate condition and steepness.

55027442 almost 8 years ago

Removed Shuttlemate Airport Transfers & Tours as it appears to have no physical location in Palmwoods for customers to attend. See their website: http://www.shuttlemate.com.au

55029485 almost 8 years ago

http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

55029485 almost 8 years ago

There is a tool in iD for squaring the buildings and will make all the angles = 90 degrees.

55027442 almost 8 years ago

There is no point in adding this to the OpenStreetMap if you do not have a physical building location to map the details to. The OSM is not a business directory. If you do not have a physical address point where your business is located then Google Maps is the best solution for you needs.

55002524 almost 8 years ago

You need to locate this a your physical business address to use on the OpenStreetMap.
Also please use the documented syntacs for the opening hours.

47113518 about 8 years ago

Hi Benny
I had a look in Josm, then reverted the changeset, then used the JOSM Validator on the polygon and found the problem was at this position…

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kbk3wkhox14hzz/self%20intersect.png?dl=0

I then un-did the revert (back to what Map Roulette did to it) and saw that Map Roulette split off that small polygon and converted the 2 polygons into a multipolygon, which seems the best way map things that have seperate polygon bits. I think a few other small polygons could also be treated in the same way. If you zoom in really close on those you can see that they don’t intersect and have a small gap between the lines so that the Map Roulette routine did not detect an error.

I have not saved anything doing this so all should be ok.

regards
Nev

47113518 about 8 years ago

Mate, that's too long ago for me to remember. You can put them duplicate segments back if you wish :)
Greetings for Christmas and New Year.

54557739 about 8 years ago

This changeset was placed on a roadway node so have reverted it. You need to place it on the building outline that it occupies.

51126955 about 8 years ago

DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery is more recent than Bing in this area.

54021439 about 8 years ago

Reverted Changeset: 54021439 as no physical business presence on the ground evident or mapped and no response from original mapper.

54253422 about 8 years ago

I now agree with the deletion of the proposed Melbourne Airport Railway Line until the proposal is more defined. Seems even the route is not decided or the time frame from my reading though I am not a local.

54253422 about 8 years ago

I would like to know the reason you have deleted the Proposed Melbourne Airport Railway Line that was recently mapped.
As it is amongst the most useful map information for many users, are you replacing it with more complete information?

54234402 about 8 years ago

Can you use a more sensible comment than “Pokemon GO” as it draws everyones attention, probably unecessarily, to your edits. Pokemon GO fantasy edits are not wanted.