This is some text from osm inspector (areas)…
Old-style multipolygons
Multipolygon relations with tags on the (outer) ways instead of on the relation. This is deprecated and should not be used any more. Move the tags from the outer ways to the relation.

If a ring of the relation really has an individual name then that can be added to that particular way. But, the name of the relation should only be added to the relation and not to the outer ways.

Hi, please do not add names to the ways than form the bounds of the boundary relation or multipolygons. The name is only added to the relation and not to the individual ways that form the polygons. The outer ways are left untagged. Please read the wiki on this.
I expect that all the names you have added to the outer ways will need to be reverted.

Hi, the web site hours for the Moore Park Beach clinic has it closed on Sat and open on Sun.

Thanks, I have deleted the duplicate.

Hi, you have placed two defibrillators on the same spot here. Are there two or should one be deleted?

Hi, there appears to be an overlap here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.81914&lat=-31.97845&zoom=15

Building looks much better now :)

The building you have added is not very close to it's shape.

Our wiki has more info
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Hi multipolygons cannot share outer rings.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.76863&lat=-19.24681&zoom=15

Hi, this is mapped as a relation and the name is only added to the relation...not the outer ways.

Thanks for mapping this. These new areas are not complete in Capad 2024 and I couldn’t readily find a source available to osm to use to add them all yet. I’ll work through Capad 2024 changes for now. The areas may meet the Capad criteria to make it into Capad 2026 but that won’t be available until 2027. So hopefully a solution is found before then.

I see you have added names to outer ways of a few individual areas of other NP sections.
I now think that is a valid way to name explicit parts with the parks.

It is best practice not to join areas to roadway centreline nodes. In this case the conservation area border probably ends near the property line or fence line. Not mixing or joining roadway parts makes it easier for data users.

Hi, the conservation park is mapped as a boundary relation and the name is added to the relation only. The members forming the mp should remain untagged. Same for multipolygon relations.
Exception would be if the way added to the relation is an entity itself… like a lake.
See the wiki for boundary or multipolygon relations

Yes, feel free. I’m watching the Aflw grandfinal tonight 🏉

Thanks InfernoOSM, I’ll try to map that tomorrow.

Hi, you have changed the role of ways forming Trigona Nature Refuge from 'outer' to 'inner' and this is incorrect.
You have also added 'name=Capricorn Coast National Park Cocoanut Point' to the outer ways of Capricorn Coast National Park.
I think it would be best the NP outerway need not be named in this way.
If you want to add 'Cocoanut Point' I think it would be better to add it as place=locality plus
name=Cocoanut Point

Hi, osmi picks up these errors for you to correct
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=130.84876&lat=-12.42304&zoom=14