Hi, there appears to be a section here that has been broken.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.06782&lat=-35.26725&zoom=14

I have reverted this changeset that added a city building to a ferry route in Brisbane

Hi, why is E Block included in this relation?
relation/18637311#map=15/-27.47915/153.02750

Thanks for fixing this up

The 06z version of osmi still picks the anomaly up
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.65078&lat=-42.86792&zoom=16
The small water feature near the intersection of Carlton River Road and Provence Drive is an inner but the outer wooded area that surrounds it is not in the relation so you need to either delete this water from the existing mp or add the wooded area surrounding the water to the mp.

Thanks, I’ll check again tomorrow.

Hi, osmi found the mp seems to be missing bits in the far se and looks like there is an inner missing its outer
relation/7148585#map=14/-42.86813/147.65123

Hi Janki, I reverted this changeset as adding a relation to the street for a sales office is an incorrect method. Instead, you should add a new point or node at the sales office building or draw the outline of that building and add your tags to that. There is no need to add all the superfluous tags to Propeller Ave.

I expect the housenumber should be a number in the 400’s

Hi, 20 and 22 Falconer Street building should be drawn as two separate houses

Looking more into the street numbering on Pitt St on various maps, I am totally perplexed by the numbering system.
You may have it all correct.

Hi, you have added addr:housenummber=63 but this business is not placed at 63 Pitt Street, Sydney on the map.
I note the housenumber and unit number are both 63. Is your business on the ground floor or on another level. Your website has no address details…only a phone number.
Do you have a physical business site where customers can attend. This would be the best position to locate your business on the map.

Hi, you accidentally dragged 8 Stocks Road node from its correct location.

Hi, the tree row is not present in satellite image and the footway appears incorrect.

Hi, the building draw at 7-9 Wadham Parade is actually two separate houses

Hi, the two buildings addressed relations should be redone as simple polygons with out the join

Hi John, can you delete the name Buuilding from one of these.

Hi, the imagery appears out of date for address 492. If you check Esri imagery you will see two new buildings…units 1 & 2.
It is always best practice to check both Bing and Esri as Esri is often more recent.

Hi, there are two buildings at 316 and both are addressed as unit 1.
I expect that one should be unit 2

Hi, this polygon appears to only cover part of the building footprint.