I've removed the private tag from the graveyard.

Have the gates been surveyed or are they "assumed"?

Sent to [email protected] but no response.

Think most of this one needs reverting:

changeset/62102102#map=17/51.49793/-2.54306

Looks like this is drawn using out of date imagery through a "construction" area -- http://www.southwestbusiness.co.uk/sectors/construction-and-commercial-property/06102015172238-builder-taylor-wimpey-buys-land-near-uwe-bristol-for-550-new-homes

Sent to [email protected] but no response.

Well, quite a few boats are buildings -- so I don't see why a canopy can't be one :-)

Good to clear up where schools really are -- signage was pretty useless.

Someone's deleted the "tent" bit!

You removed the fixme=approximate on the schools -- they were there as it wasn't clear which part of the whole was each school.

Nope definitely a drive, surveyed it on foot today.

I think this one needs reverting - you've deleted the parking that was surveyed on foot and dragged a building to an odd shape.

Is this a track?

DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the roads - might need to align the imagery first tho'

Is this residential or service?

Is this a driveway?

Folly Brook looks ok now thanks.

FYI: JOSM has a filter window if you don't want to edit stuff like waterways or boundaries.

You seem to have dragged a stream about -- any chance you can do a partial revert?

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62016248

Glad it helped -- great to see some buildings in the gaps :-)

Have you tried the ESRI clarity layer -- it's got a lot better detail in Bristol -- not as up to date in areas with new builds tho'. Note this was the old Bing layer so a lot of stuff's already been added with that imagery offset.

Looks like the whole of Corsham is now a church -- I think you tagged the wrong way -- easily done.

Please just don't use "-" it's a real pain trying to select the link in "History" -- "buildings and roads" was at least easy to click on.

Please just don't use "-" it's a real pain trying to select the link in "History" -- "buildings and roads" was at least easy to click on.

Please just don't use "." it's a real pain trying to select the link in "History" -- "buildings and roads" was at least easy to click on.

The stadium is already named: way/188698415

I'll revert the change of naming the pitch.

Great -- always good to see some gaps get filled in.