Should probably be a single building then?

L-shape was mosty based on "rooflines" -- it's a pain trying to sort out buildings there :-)

What did it say when you surveyed it?

Should other items such as phone no, twitter, etc. be removed -- or are they still current?

Or just add "access=private"?

Great that you added the extra Aztec West park -- where did you get the name from? Pretty sure there's no signage.

If there were pedestrian access it would have a sidewalk tag.

I'm pretty sure this change is wrong -- I mapped it pretty carefully from a photo-survey.

Great, but this is already mapped.

I've moved the restaurant back to Kongs -- to keep the postcode, address and FHRS reference accurate. But I've removed the "Burger Theory" name to avoid confusion -- it is already mapped on Saint Stephens Street.

I've corrected the bad drag of a point on Taylor Gardens.

Did you survey this?

Only Bing shows building as you've drawn them.

I surveyed and drew some of the ones you deleted only about 6 months ago.

It doesn't have "junction=roundabout" -- if a router wants to recommend a violent turn, then it probably needs fixing, But common sense should also prevail when using a results from routing s/ware.

I'll have a look at the signage in the future..

This is unnecessary "tagging for the router" - Strava need to fix their app. Other routers have no problems: osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.50505%2C-2.61403%3B51.50292%2C-2.61347#map=18/51.50398/-2.61405

I understand why you added the restrictions - but they should only be there if they are signed -- are you sure there's a sign there?

I've had a quick go at adding the building, etc. It might not be great, but hopefully close enough so you can fix it.

Sorry about that -- looked like a good match!

Uploaded photo from original 2016 mapping to flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/37364060580/in/dateposted-public/

You can't use Google Streetview as a source for OSM https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps

Other maps have their own copyright and shouldn't be copied.

If it's useable for a brewery delivery, then it should probably remain as a service. If not then it's probably better as highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated, segragated=no -- I think that's the JOSM defaults for a shared path.

You seem to be trying to change the map tagging to fix cycle routing - unless there's an obvious error or ommision this is considered bad practice. If routing software isn't working correctly please file a bug with its developers, rather than "tagging for the router".

Not a building either.