It would be nice to be consistent with other sports grounds like RGS.

Cheers for adding details back.

FYI -- I tend to add building/address POIs where precise location was fuzzy, e.g. can see the housename in a photo, but can't directly locate it -- I'll try and remember to add a "fixme=approximate" in the future -- but there's probably still some old ones about.

Some of the housenumbers that were approximate POIs are now added to buildings -- did you survey them to check exactly where they should go?

I can see you've deleted some of the more detailed tracing like extensions and porches -- which is a shame as a lot of this was photo surveyed on foot. Just because you can't see the outline on satellite imagery doesn't mean it's not there -- it's often blurred / in shadow.

Just wondered if "access=private" is better than "foot=no" on way/646093568

If they are kissing gates they should be marked as barrier=kissing_gate -- it's important as gate might not be open for walkers whereas kissing gate by implication will be (and conversely for vehicles :-)

Not all objects show up on the "normal" map -- that's ok -- it's just an example. There are specialised versions of OSM maps that show more objects and types of paths for walkers, e.g. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12!51.4628!-2.5724 or http://www.free-map.org.uk/

The position of the hot wells is supposedly near way/373705726 -- if I remember my guided walk correctly.

Not convinced on this -- it seems you've moved Hotwells somewhere between Cumberland Basin and Cliftonwood?

No worries.

It's still signed as Westpoint - at least tonight :-)

Well, realised it wasn't a separate building part, so demoted it to a POI within the co-op (exact position TBD).

As to the other building - looks like it's in an industrial estate from ESRI imagery -- maybe a Royal Mail factity perhaps, rather than a post office per se?

Reverting this one.

Pedestrian crossing is on the adjacent separated footpath as marked on the map.

True, but signage hasn't changed - please revert.

yep, only guided PSVs.

This has been reverted - these roads are not accessible to normal PSVs - see mapillary tracks, etc.

I've connected these (and others) to roads where they stopped just before -- hope that's ok, otherwise routing won't work.

I've reverted most of this - see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=N8F3Xt1NiiKi7mcKBk5ACg&lat=51.449621449390236&lng=-2.5928839225609863&z=17

Maybe this would be good to add:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/thread.html#78902

Still not sure what Żabka has to do with IKEA -- but good to see that there is a hint about "brand:wikipedia" in the wiki now :-)

Perhaps linking to the discussion on the imports list would be better in terms of a justification -- and more informative.

It breaks all existing tools -- will ask DWG to take a look -- if it just added something like wikipedia:link = brand, then fine it's just "noise", those that care read it, those that don't can continue as usual.