Anderson, de onde você obteve o nome das ruas, por favor?

Hi.
It seems that you did import a lot of data here. Was it discussed somewhere, please?
Note that you included some amenity=private_toilet objects which don't exist anywhere else in OSM (which may indicate that there has been no prior planning or discussion)

Ah... se você conseguir só desgrudar o objeto, é melhor (ao invés de apagar e depois criar novamente)
Mas sim, o mais correto é não grudar a área com as ruas ao lado mesmo.

syberdyner, porque você apagou esse monte de objetos aqui?

Oh, sorry for that.
I locally use "har=har" as some kind of reminder to take a look at the area (something that needs to be fixed, mapped, etc) and it seems that I forgot to either verify these areas or remove the nodes.
For this specific case, they are small places/farms and are now fixed.
Thanks for the warning.

Thanks!

syberdyner, procure não grudar as áreas nas ruas, que isso não é correto.
Desenhe as áreas apenas nos locais onde elas realmente existem, sem conectar com qualquer rua ao lado.

MAALIN22, from where you are importing this data, please?

Hello, nlehuby.

It seems that you are doing an automated editing and removing sport=swimming from pools.

Regardless of whether the pool is private or not, it seems that there is no problem in having sport=swimming in them; people swim and practice swimming even if the pool is private, right?

I don't know if you are aware of it, but it's good to read osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct before continuing such edits.

It's also good to discuss such mass modifications with the community, before simply removing/modifying a tag.

Can we revert these edits?

Automatic translation below
---
Bonjour, nlehuby.

Il semble que vous êtes en train de faire un montage automatisé et de supprimer sport=swimming des piscines.

Que la piscine soit privée ou non, il semble qu'il n'y ait pas de problème à avoir le sport=swimming en eux; les gens nagent et pratiquent la natation même si la piscine est privée, non?

Je ne sais pas si vous êtes au courant, mais il est bon de lire osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct avant de continuer ces modifications.

Il est également bon de discuter de telles modifications de masse avec la communauté, avant de simplement supprimer/modifier une tag.

Pouvons-nous revenir ces modifications ?

Maybe it's necessary to better verify paths like this way/654844805
I think that there isn't a path there; even if there was, it should be connected to the near highways (otherwise it will be unusable by any routing software)

Hi, MTG5093
Paths like this way/654858667 don't receive a street name here.

This probably reverts all of #65397498

This probably reverts all of #65397318

This probably reverts all of #65397150

This probably reverts all of #65397003

This probably reverts all of #65396785

This probably reverts all of #65396627

Great!
Let me know as soon as you have any news about the license of this data.
If you have any questions and I can help, just send a message.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.

If you can get in touch with them to clarify that, it'll be perfect.

In the meantime, can we revert this import?

There are places where the inserted data got duplicated with the objects that were already on the map. For example, this address already existed way/616966931 and you inserted the same at node/6132038786

It might be interesting to discuss about this import, in a first moment, in the Canadian mappers list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca or in the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=16

Of course, by having the license information and checking a way to not duplicate the data (and avoid some other possible inconsistencies), we can reinsert this data later into OpenStreetMap.

Is that okay for you?

Right.
I believe there are 2 parts here: one is that we should all be aware of the import guidelines, available at osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Imports, especially like this one, should be discussed first.

For this specific case it is also good to read osm.wiki/OpenAddresses.io

The other part is that I could not find any information about the license or the terms of use of this data in any of the following places:

http://results.openaddresses.io/sources/ca/on/leeds_grenville

https://github.com/openaddresses/openaddresses/blob/master/sources/ca/on/leeds_grenville.json

https://services3.arcgis.com/KQcdsE7S72bcD7R8/ArcGIS/rest/services/CivicAddress/FeatureServer/0

https://www.leedsgrenville.com/en/services/maps-and-gis.aspx

Do you know any place where we could get such information, please?