nammala's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 47545446 | over 8 years ago | Is the building under construction, Could you please confirm |
| 47529767 | over 8 years ago | Hi chnav,
Спасибо, что узнали о дубликатах и комментировали набор изменений. В этой области было много дубликатов. Не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, сообщить мне следующее действие на этот счет. Хотели бы вы это убрать. Regards,
|
| 47527768 | over 8 years ago | Hi lluu001, I have Reverted the changeset which has fictional data in the null island. Please don't do this again. Regards,
|
| 45771193 | over 8 years ago | Hi kaitesi olivia, The area=tag to the buildings in not a valid one. I have corrected the edit. Regards,
|
| 45510950 | over 8 years ago | Hi Nanrina, Could you please make sure to tag group of buildings as `landuse=residential` instead of building=house. Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping. 건물 그룹 대신 '토지 이용 = 주거용'으로 건물 그룹을 태그하십시오. 매핑과 관련하여 필요한 것이 있으면 알려주세요. Regards,
|
| 47605995 | over 8 years ago | Hi felipebarreto, Could you please make sure you don't add parks over the buildings which is not a good practise. Regards,
|
| 47592605 | over 8 years ago | For your information, I just bought back the previous history edit which has been for most of the versions, I am not making to do fantasy mapping to make clear. Anyways thanks for the local knowledge and getting the edit clarified. |
| 46718815 | over 8 years ago | k ika-Chan thanks |
| 46718815 | over 8 years ago | Hi ika-chan, May I know the next actions on this changeset. |
| 47493948 | over 8 years ago | Hi ck C, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The building tag you have given for the group of buildings in not appropriate. Please make sure to edit buildings which are individual not tagging group of buildings into one building.
Regards,
|
| 47511027 | over 8 years ago | Awesome thank you . By the way great job improving the map. Regards,
|
| 47511027 | over 8 years ago | Hi katpatuka, May I know the reason behind deleting `name:en` in the two features
|
| 47492728 | over 8 years ago | Great thanks for getting back |
| 47492477 | over 8 years ago | Hi Julie Haydar Beaini, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you deleted the trees and added fake parks , I reverted your changeset. Please don't delete valuable data on map and add data which is only ground truth and not fantasy data.
Regards,
|
| 47494541 | over 8 years ago | Hi Mertsalo, Welcome and thanks for contributing to Open StreetMap (OSM). Great that you have been contributing to HOT mapping projects and the tagging you are giving for the residential areas like `building=residential` is not appropriate please provide `landuse=residential` which is a valid one.
Regards,
|
| 47492728 | over 8 years ago | Please don't add fantasy data to the map. |
| 47491978 | over 8 years ago | Hi BroFahroe, Make sure you add proper buildings tags to the buildings and also don't add random names.
|
| 47452082 | over 8 years ago | Hi brunokatz, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made are suspicious the way you added buildings and also also deleted the nodes of administrative boundary and also the place of worship and non existing area=yes tag all looks very suspicious. Please make sure you don't repeat it again. regards,
|
| 47434457 | over 8 years ago | Hi moeche, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits of yours looks good but please make sure not giving random name tags. Please give appropriate name tags. Regards,
|
| 47335776 | over 8 years ago | The park you have added doesn't seem to be present in the ground and OSM is the data which is ground truth. and also the name of the park, May I know the reason behind doing it |