nammala's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 46264323 | almost 9 years ago | Thanks for the clarification. Got back the edits changeset/46273194 |
| 46033146 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Fonchy, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed that you have been some buildings and also some buildings with `area=yes` tag . May I know the reason behind doing this. I also observed one user who is doing this kind of mapping activity like giving `area=yes` to buildings : @julio%20osorio/history#map=17/10.98592/-74.80702. Regards,
|
| 38799768 | almost 9 years ago | Hi julio osorio, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The `area=yes` tag is not valid for buildings. The buildings should be given building=*. Let me know if you need anything. Regards,
|
| 46050477 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Fonchy, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed a lot of buildings were deleted. May I know the reason deleting the buildings. Could you please confirm the deletions you have made. Regards,
|
| 46208780 | almost 9 years ago | Hi ninjaslayer461, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings which exists in the Imagery. Regards,
|
| 46152949 | almost 9 years ago | Hi orangelemonjelly, May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from `town` -> `village` of node/415155951/history. Can you please mention the source. Regards,
|
| 45536405 | almost 9 years ago | Hi sw2393, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits in the changeset like waterbody (469255467) and the national park with a relation doesn't make proper data which is not on the ground. Make sure you add ground truth data rather than adding fantasy data. I am going ahead and deleting your edits. Let me know if you need anything. Regards,
|
| 46082687 | almost 9 years ago | Hi orangelemonjelly, May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from town -> village. Could you please confirm the change. Regards,
|
| 46048305 | almost 9 years ago | Hi user204938, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the imagery source you have been using is open to use or not. Is it legal to use osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ . Since we should not use proprietary sources. Could you please confirm. 환영합니다. OpenStreetMap에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다. 사용중인 이미지 소스가 사용 가능한지 여부를 알 수 있습니까? osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ를 사용하는 것이 합법적입니까? 독점적 인 출처를 사용해서는 안되기 때문입니다. 확인해 주시겠습니까? Regards,
|
| 45999478 | almost 9 years ago | Thanks for getting back Nesim |
| 46046802 | almost 9 years ago | Hi BesfortGuri, May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from town -> city . Which is resembling as town in the wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka%C3%A7anik. Regards,
|
| 45989811 | almost 9 years ago | Hi orangelemonjelly, May I know the reason behind changing the name tags to the way -> node/415156304/history. Also the source of changing. Regards,
|
| 46030346 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Something B, The `name:en` tag you have provided for the way -> way/232537150/history#map=18/44.96644/35.26266 seems inappropriate as the tag `nudism=yes` is already mentioned and I am going ahead and deleting the tag. Regards,
|
| 46038102 | almost 9 years ago | Hi orangelemonjelly, May I know the reason behind changing the place tag from town to village for the node -> node/415158163/history. Regards,
|
| 45999478 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Nesim, The edit you have made for the change in the `place` tag from city to town . But as the wikipedia says it is a district https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ata%C5%9Fehir. Could you please confirm the change. Happy Mapping Regards,
|
| 44673021 | almost 9 years ago | I also cross checked with other imageries and seems the water body exists. I went ahead and resolved the reversion changeset/45845176. My bad I haven't compared with other imageries and the Bing is not that clear . |
| 44673021 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Verdy_p, Thanks for getting back, The user is new to the OSM and he has only 1 edit and I commented on the changeset one month ago and he didn't get back for the clarification and the edit was also not that appropriate like he drew a square box for the pond which is not precise. As you said the local knowledge knows well the changeset comment he has provided also not proper. If there is a way body existing there could you please revert my changeset changeset/44721513 and get it back. Regards,
|
| 45734627 | almost 9 years ago | Hi 포고고고, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems intentionally okay you have been deleting some bad stuff on the map. But the footways you have added doesn't have good alignment or precision. I am deleting the edits . Make sure you add data with proper alignment. Let me know if you need anything. Regards,
|
| 45688211 | almost 9 years ago | Hi dElEtE4EvEr, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems incorrect make sure you add valuable data on map. I am going ahead and deleting the edits you have made. Regards,
|
| 45688651 | almost 9 years ago | HI iyszxqandar, Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have made seems inappropriate. OSM is the real map of the world, Please add data which is on ground. I am going ahead and deleting your changeset. Regards,
|