OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
46264323 almost 9 years ago

Thanks for the clarification. Got back the edits changeset/46273194

46033146 almost 9 years ago

Hi Fonchy,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed that you have been some buildings and also some buildings with `area=yes` tag . May I know the reason behind doing this. I also observed one user who is doing this kind of mapping activity like giving `area=yes` to buildings : @julio%20osorio/history#map=17/10.98592/-74.80702.

Regards,
nammala

38799768 almost 9 years ago

Hi julio osorio,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The `area=yes` tag is not valid for buildings. The buildings should be given building=*. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala

46050477 almost 9 years ago

Hi Fonchy,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed a lot of buildings were deleted. May I know the reason deleting the buildings. Could you please confirm the deletions you have made.

Regards,
nammala

46208780 almost 9 years ago

Hi ninjaslayer461,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala

46152949 almost 9 years ago

Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from `town` -> `village` of node/415155951/history. Can you please mention the source.

Regards,
nammala

45536405 almost 9 years ago

Hi sw2393,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits in the changeset like waterbody (469255467) and the national park with a relation doesn't make proper data which is not on the ground. Make sure you add ground truth data rather than adding fantasy data. I am going ahead and deleting your edits. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala

46082687 almost 9 years ago

Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from town -> village. Could you please confirm the change.

Regards,
nammala

46048305 almost 9 years ago

Hi user204938,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the imagery source you have been using is open to use or not. Is it legal to use osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ . Since we should not use proprietary sources. Could you please confirm.

환영합니다. OpenStreetMap에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다. 사용중인 이미지 소스가 사용 가능한지 여부를 알 수 있습니까? osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ를 사용하는 것이 합법적입니까? 독점적 인 출처를 사용해서는 안되기 때문입니다. 확인해 주시겠습니까?

Regards,
nammala

45999478 almost 9 years ago

Thanks for getting back Nesim

46046802 almost 9 years ago

Hi BesfortGuri,

May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from town -> city . Which is resembling as town in the wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka%C3%A7anik.

Regards,
nammala

45989811 almost 9 years ago

Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the name tags to the way -> node/415156304/history. Also the source of changing.

Regards,
nammala

46030346 almost 9 years ago

Hi Something B,

The `name:en` tag you have provided for the way -> way/232537150/history#map=18/44.96644/35.26266 seems inappropriate as the tag `nudism=yes` is already mentioned and I am going ahead and deleting the tag.

Regards,
nammala

46038102 almost 9 years ago

Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the place tag from town to village for the node -> node/415158163/history.

Regards,
nammala

45999478 almost 9 years ago

Hi Nesim,

The edit you have made for the change in the `place` tag from city to town . But as the wikipedia says it is a district https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ata%C5%9Fehir. Could you please confirm the change.

Happy Mapping

Regards,
nammala

44673021 almost 9 years ago

I also cross checked with other imageries and seems the water body exists. I went ahead and resolved the reversion changeset/45845176. My bad I haven't compared with other imageries and the Bing is not that clear .

44673021 almost 9 years ago

Hi Verdy_p,

Thanks for getting back, The user is new to the OSM and he has only 1 edit and I commented on the changeset one month ago and he didn't get back for the clarification and the edit was also not that appropriate like he drew a square box for the pond which is not precise. As you said the local knowledge knows well the changeset comment he has provided also not proper. If there is a way body existing there could you please revert my changeset changeset/44721513 and get it back.

Regards,
nammala

45734627 almost 9 years ago

Hi 포고고고,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems intentionally okay you have been deleting some bad stuff on the map. But the footways you have added doesn't have good alignment or precision. I am deleting the edits . Make sure you add data with proper alignment. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala

45688211 almost 9 years ago

Hi dElEtE4EvEr,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems incorrect make sure you add valuable data on map. I am going ahead and deleting the edits you have made.

Regards,
nammala

45688651 almost 9 years ago

HI iyszxqandar,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have made seems inappropriate. OSM is the real map of the world, Please add data which is on ground. I am going ahead and deleting your changeset.

Regards,
nammala