OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
153294486 over 1 year ago

Hi Mr Chinnam,

I'm going to revert your contributions in Nicaragua. They do not match our standards. All building shapes should be squared out and match exactly the sat imagery. Most of your shapes are far too big.

Please compare to other building shapes in Nicaragua. Thanks.

153191085 over 1 year ago

Edmond,

Your building shapes are far too big compared to the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes.

I'm going to revert your last changeset.

153215173 over 1 year ago

Hi,
Again - please narrow down the shapes of your buildings. This large building on your changeset has on the aerial imagery maybe 20% of the surface. You combined several buildings in an L-shape and made a big square of it.

153219304 over 1 year ago

Please narrow down the shapes of your buildings. Nearly all of the are too big. Thank you.

153219509 over 1 year ago

Hi,

Your building shapes are mostly too big compared to the aerial imagery. Do not include shadows and empty spaces around buildings please.

Thank you for your contribution to OSM Nicaragua

153159396 over 1 year ago

Phil,

Please stop using the tag house=house for buildings. The correct tag is building=yes.
Also please square out all building.

Thank you

152884963 over 1 year ago

Please square out your buildings. Thank you.

152897984 over 1 year ago

Hi,

Please narrow down you buildings shapes. Don't include several buildings in one shape. Don't include farmyards into the building shape.
Thank you.

152890945 over 1 year ago

Hi, I already corrected and deleted these buildings. If you check the history of the node=11991870599, you will see that I modified it 2x after your inital creating. So the buildings match now the aerial imagery.

152945231 over 1 year ago

Hi Sheryl,

Please don't add generic names to building shapes.

Also please square out 99% of the building shapes.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.

152097611 over 1 year ago

Hi fsilve,

Your building shapes in OSM are often far bigger than the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them, I'm sorry.

Thanks for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.

152934490 over 1 year ago

Hi Shridhar,

Please square out all buildings shapes (or 99%). Please narrow down your shapes to match the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete some of your shapes, they are far bigger than the imagery.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.

152879452 over 1 year ago

Please stop adding these crappy building shapes. This is considered vandalism!

152879266 over 1 year ago

This is simply VANDALISM!

152885309 over 1 year ago

Connie,
Your buildings shapes are far bigger than the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them all.

152883222 over 1 year ago

Sofia,
Your building shapes are far bigger than the actual aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Please narrow down your buildings to match exactly the satellite imagery. Thanks.

152917063 over 1 year ago

Adriana,

I delete a few of your recent building shapes - they were far bigger than the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes to the imagery without shapes or empty space around the house.
Thank you.

152876310 over 1 year ago

AShwini,

Your building shapes are far too big. I'm going to delete them.
Please narrow down to match exactly the aerial imagery.

152885111 over 1 year ago

Ben,

Please don't connect buildings shapes to boundaries, highways and landuse=*.
Please square out all buildings.

Thanks.

152890387 over 1 year ago

John,

As mentioned on another edit. I'm deleting your building shapes which are far too big compared to the aerial imagery.