merylstreet's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 82174224 | about 3 years ago | You can change, just please pay attention to the fact that there is a pier at that area, I let you tag as appropriate.
|
| 82174224 | about 3 years ago | Hi Rizki,
|
| 40594516 | about 3 years ago | Hi Rizki,
|
| 129347516 | about 3 years ago | good point, didn't see the other one on the map. I know for sure the one I saw was on the left hand side when entering the station, so probably it changed location
|
| 129143705 | about 3 years ago | I only saw Chinese characters and can't read them, but this is the one https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g13806886-d550665-Reviews-Henan_Temple-Shoufeng_Hualien.html
|
| 128446197 | about 3 years ago | My bad, actually the part "Comment cartographier les adresses" of the above url seems to refer to this, saying it is debated and links to an english link, so I don't think there is only one way of doing it in France |
| 128446197 | about 3 years ago | Hi, thanks a lot for your detailed feedback, it made me learn about this provides_features which I didn't know about.
I checked what is the recommandation for France and there is no consensus currently osm.wiki/FR:Adresses ("Bâtiments avec plusieurs numéros d'adresses") I think we should not to remove any street name/number completely from POIs unless there is an associated relation with this provides_feature. Maybe I will try to create an overpass query to detect if it is missing following an edit. Cheers! |
| 128446197 | about 3 years ago | I completely understand your way of working if the POIs have changed significantly but looking at this one through achavi, I don't think this is the proper way to make changes.
From my perspective, I understand that you might not be certain of the address, I am not certain either sometimes, but I really try not to remove what other people added in osm.
Do you have some wiki reference or discussion that recommend not having POI address but instead separate complete address nodes? I try to stay open and update my way of working if it makes sense.
|
| 128446197 | about 3 years ago | Hi there, Just wondering why removing the street name on a number of these shops? |
| 127114661 | about 3 years ago | Hello Snusmumriken, No problem in English ;) That's a very good point, I hadn't noticed that this had been present and removed previously. I saw that the whole building is tagged as Société Générale and on below link this is their official address:
I have no problem to remove the addr:street part. Just curious what is at the location of the 2 other address on that building? Thanks for keeping an eye and pointing out my edits :D Cheers |
| 126769878 | about 3 years ago | Bonjour, en effet je n'avais pas pensé à cela ! Merci du conseil ;) Du coup je me concentre sur les addr:street !
|
| 66298162 | almost 7 years ago | Made the changes myself under #517287785 |
| 66298162 | almost 7 years ago | This change should be reverted due to weird changes noticed and no feedback from user for almost 2 months |
| 45230736 | almost 9 years ago | The north part of the area is still scrub I would say but all the south has been built or just a few patches left of vegetations. I live in this area so I will check again this weekend and update |
| 45230736 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Iain, this area is being completely rebuilt, now its mostly condos and constructions sites with a few green patches, does scrub still apply? |