Leading zero still missing.
And please remove the conditional from the node.

Thanks!

Hi, the maxspeed-conditional should be on a way not on a node.
Please remove the "=" as it is not necessary.
And please add a leading-zero to the first hour (06:30 instead of 6:30)

What is the maxspeed from 17:00 to 06:30? Please add this as normal "maxspeed".

Check it out here: maxspeed:conditional=*

Danke, gibt es dazu eine Veröffentlichung der Presse oder Gemeinde? Dort verlaufen mehrere offizielle Wanderwege, die ja dann umgeroutet werden müssten.

Hi, die Sperrung nur in den "name" einzutragen hat keinen großen Nutzen leider. Was heißt denn geschlossen? Für immer? Oder nur eine Zeit lang?
Kommen nicht mal mehr Fußgänger hier rüber? Danke!

Hi, are these POIs really existing? Two ATMs directly nearby? And the name is just "1"?

Hi, regardless of the signs it's mostly a good idea to save the old name as "alt_name" or "old_name" to have a little bit history. As there is the Spring with the name "Hellabründl" nearby it's quite sure the "old" name had an intention :) I've already did this here.

What's the name of the hotel? And is it actually in a building?

Thanks

Hi, schön das du mitmachst!
Wenn das ein Fuß-und Radweg ist, dann sollte der Weg über die Brücke kein highway=footway sondern auch ein highway=path werden. Sonst kommt da kein Radfahrer mit dem Navi drüber.

Und der Weg hört unten beim landuse auf und nicht beim track!

Viele Grüße

Hi UWJ, you specified on this path that it is surface=paved but tracktype=grade2, which doesn't match from my point of view.
surface=paved is a paved and solid surface.
tracktype=grade2 is an unpaved surface.

Is it gravel? Or asphalt? Or something else?

Can you take another look at this? Thanks a lot!

See also:
tracktype=*
surface=paved

Keine Antwort, CS wurde wiederhergestellt.

Hi, ist die Straße hier auf über 630 Metern eine Brücke?

You should ask tagging Mailinglist and the new forum I guess. And the wiki is a free place as OSM is.

Yes, then the first step would be to have unity in the community and then in the wiki.

I mean in size of the bbox. Tools like OSMCha reports a problem anywhere in this area.

Is there an entry on the wiki about the current tagging being wrong? Or is there an entry in the wiki that you are not allowed to use both tags at the same time?

I think you forgot yourself as an author in the wiki entry right?

And the relation here has only two instead of three members: relation/6854367

Could you please pay attention to smaller changesets in the future. QA tools have very big problems with this. Thank you very much.

What is harmful about the double execution?