mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168607183 | 6 months ago | Ja, linksseitig macht es keinen Sinn, da dort kein Radweg vorhanden ist.
Des weiteren hat es ohne "Hauptzeichen" nach meinem Verständnis der StVO gar keine rechtliche Aussagekraft, da Zusatzzeichen nur mit Hauptzeichen gültig sind. Kurzum: Wie würdest du es eintragen wollen? Nur mit `hazard=damaged_road` (wie von mir vorgeschlagen) oder ein `traffic_sign=DE:Freitext:Rad_u._Gehweg-schäden"? |
| 168366319 | 6 months ago | Hi Alt7706, thanks for your reply and questions! You're absolutely welcome to contribute wherever you travel — that's one of the great things about OpenStreetMap! The suggestion to keep changesets local isn't meant to limit contributions, but to help with a few practical things: 1. Easier Review and Collaboration
2. Avoiding Conflicts
3. Data Clarity
To be clear: you're not doing anything wrong by contributing in many countries! It's just a recommendation to save edits more frequently and keep each changeset focused on one area at a time. This makes the project smoother for everyone involved. Happy mapping and thanks again for contributing to OSM! |
| 136083531 | 6 months ago | Interesting, Every Door must have set it up that way automatically back then; at least, it wasn't intentional on my part. Here is a “stamp spot.” This is common in hiking areas; it's usually a small wooden box with a stamp pad for signing your hiking logbook.
I will update it! |
| 168366319 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 165334181 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 165966676 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 166358308 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 168301873 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 166937984 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167225553 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167251835 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167361110 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167444211 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167582191 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 168275795 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167875355 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167780392 | 6 months ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 167776995 | 6 months ago | Grüß dich,
Viele Grüße
|
| 167702488 | 6 months ago | Abgeleitet von einem Parkplatz kann man „fee=yes” angeben, um auszudrücken, dass der Parkplatz grundsätzlich kostenpflichtig ist. Zusätzlich ist laut Wiki auch „charge” erlaubt, um anzugeben, was der Parkplatz genau kostet (bspw. „charge=5 EUR/day”). Wieso können wir hier nicht einfach beide Tags parallel einsetzen?
|
| 167702488 | 6 months ago | Aber jetzt fehlt doch die Information, dass die Benutzung 50 Cent kostet oder nicht? |