In this case, the respective city should be represented. And this city is not called “Sankt Gallen” but officially “St. Gallen”. The short form is officially the form of choice. Sbb.ch identifies the train station and map.admin.ch also labels the city as 'St. Gallen'
Currently, only 6 destination entries in OSM are “Sankt Gallen”, compared to 46 entries with “St. Gallen”.
If you think that “Sankt Gallen” is more correct, then please also adjust any place nodes and boundary relations so that it is consistent.

@rafalwlo, since the statements on the talk page are not valid according to your own argument, we can probably dispense with the opinions and statements there. The entire paragraph in the wiki is based on the Talk statements, so the entire paragraph is useless.

The abbreviation "St." for "Sankt" is the only internationally recognized usable abbreviation in the wiki. See also osm.wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion

The city's name, which is used across all borders and is "St. Gallen" in all communications, should also be taken into consideration. This is not a short form or abbreviation but the only official name of the city.

@rafalwlo, according to the official documentation of "Key:destination" in the wiki, the value for this tag describes the content of signposts. The content of the signpost here is "St. Gallen".
The discussion you mention remains unresolved, with a provisional policy suggesting that users consult with the original mapper before changing abbreviation practices in existing tags. Was the previous mapper consulted here?

Hi, thanks for your feedback. The wiki describes exactly the opposite of your statement.

Review: Der Kiosk war bereits vorhanden. Habe die Duplikate zusammengeführt und das fixme behoben: changeset/158923364

Review: Das Hotel steht bereits zum Verkauf, würde die Fläche löschen. (Hast du ja bereits)

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Lieben Dank! 🙏

Correct, the signs are clear.

That doesn't matter. After every turn, the meaning of the signs is always removed.
And the way from the north, from the east and from the south are only signposted as shared foot and cycle paths (AT:52.17a-a). The other paths leading there are correctly marked and signposted as they are and not changed from my side.

The first picture you linked shows the driveway to the allotments which is tagged as unclassified here: way/1144925210

The second one is a totally different way and was never changed by myself: way/442604636

In general, we should follow the main sign when tagging something like this. If it's actually a shared footpath/cycle path, then just path, if it's a dirt road with a ban on motor vehicles, then just track.
And a footpath with bicycle=yes doesn't become a path either.
But anyway, in this case, there are no such signs.

okay, first location should be here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810729587830619&lat=47.3919113&lng=9.68045&z=18.355836900751235&focus=photo&x=0.6250134462746177&y=0.5181897547033589&zoom=0
Second one here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3726604904273858&lat=47.3783275&lng=9.6734293&z=19.160497282455516&focus=photo&x=0.05535315256168016&y=0.4714495194653372&zoom=2.743108338115388
And the third one here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=180002684415921&focus=photo&lat=47.395482899972&lng=9.6700672&z=17&x=0.7463342849624341&y=0.14452580635753912&zoom=1.5887024964469805

Where did you spot the additional signs there?

Where is this additional “agricultural traffic free” sign supposed to be? I've just gone through my mapillary photos from the summer and can't find one either in the north at the Schmitterbrücke bridge nor in the south at the customs in Hohenems.
Or check this one in the middle: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810729587830619
way/1169123130

Do you have photos of the signage you think you know there?

The traffic sign tool has a different opinion and links to the same page: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240,1026-36
I just asked in the OSM chat and they also think that highway=path is correct. My understanding of the situation is that the proportion of traffic should be taken into account and there is definitely more bicycle and pedestrian traffic on this path than agricultural traffic.

Can you guide me to the wiki section where this is defined?

These changes have been reverted as no response has been received and the incorrect change has not been corrected.

changeset/158857143

Korrektur: changeset/158856759

Link zum Wiki noch: osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=unclassified

Grüß dich. Ein highway=unclassified bezeichnet Straßen mit "erheblichen Durchgangsverkehr". Da sich es hier um eine Sackgasse handelt, kann kein Durchgangsverkehr stattfinden. Da es sich lediglich um eine Zufahrt zu zwei Häusern handelt, war "highway=service" bereits völlig korrekt.