Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

In your case: Just upload more often in OsmAnd if possible.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

In your case: Just upload more often in OsmAnd if possible.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

In your case: Just upload more often in Organic Maps if possible.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please don't take this as criticism, but if you at least distribute the changes across countries, it makes it much easier to check the changes.

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please don't take this as criticism, but if you at least distribute the changes across countries, it makes it much easier to check the changes.

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please don't take this as criticism, but if you at least distribute the changes across countries, it makes it much easier to check the changes.

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, "surface=asphalt" ist hier aber immer noch. Was ist hier die neue Oberfläche? Danke dir.

Thanks! Make it more regional would be awesome

Your first contribution - congratulations!

I have reverted your changes, not because they were wrong or bad, but because it was easier for me to move the routes. I left the old track as ‘removed:highway’ so that it would not be redrawn from other maps / aerial photos.
I have relocated the hiking routes according to the new course.

Thanks again for your initiative - and never forget, all beginnings are difficult - especially with relations!

Hi, statt "ex." oder "ehem." sollte meines Wissens "old_ref" verwendet werden. Siehe: ref=*#Key_variations

Was denkst du?

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

This changeset has been reverted completely because of the suspicious word "test".

changeset/155196366

Danke für die Korrektur! Das hätte mir ja auffallen müssen ...

Diese Änderungen wurden vollständig rückgängig gemacht. Die Basis dafür ist:
osm.wiki/Austria/Schnellstra%C3%9Fen

Das "Problem" der S16 ist, dass sie (außerhalb der Tunnel) keinen einheitlichen Querschnitt hat. Es gibt zwar (aber sehr selten) Abschnitte, die einen "Autobahnquerschnitt" haben, d.h. breite 4-spurige Fahrbahnen, Pannenstreifen und Tempo 130, aber in Summe überwiegen jene Abschnitte die das nicht haben. Entweder nur 3 Spuren oder 4 Spuren mit sehr schmalen Fahrstreifen. In den Tunnels ist natürlich nichts von den Parameter vorhanden. Geschwindigkeit ist sowieso fast überall nur 100 oder weniger. Und nicht zuletzt ist die gesamte S16 nicht als "Autobahn", sondern nur als sondern nur als "Autostraße" qualifiziert.

Insgesamt überwiegen also deutlich die Parameter, die die S16 aus OSM-Sicht zu einer Trunk und nicht zu einem Motorway machen.

Und wichtig: Da man Straßen in der Regel einheitlich bezeichnet, hat man sich für "trunk" entschieden. Niemand ändert eine Ex-Bundesstraße innerhalb einer Stadt von primär zu sekundär/tertiär nur weil man dort schmaler/langsamer fahren kann.

Ein Gegenbeispiel zur S16 ist die S35, die auch "nur" eine Autostraße ist, die aber überall breit inkl. Pannenstreifen ist und meist 130 km/h erlaubt.

Siehe auch: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/highway-trunk-in-osterreich/87751

changeset/155156847

Review: Prima :)

Reason: User was offline :)

Reason: User was offline :)

Also darf dort nur der Pächter selbst, keine Übernachtungsgäste parken laut Schild, korrekt?

Danke dir.