mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 151088907 | over 1 year ago | Reverted the entire changeset, as it was obviously a test with major errors. |
| 151732677 | over 1 year ago | Hi Swissplay and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. In your case with StreetComplete: Upload more often :) To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 151718436 | over 1 year ago | And wouldn't it have been better to switch to building=residential at this point? |
| 151718196 | over 1 year ago | Wouldn't it have been better to switch to building=residential at this point? |
| 151718196 | over 1 year ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 151661304 | over 1 year ago | Thank you! Since I can't understand the signage either, I asked the municipality - Answer pending. On the other hand, the road in the northern part is also really steep and dangerous with a bad bike or with children. |
| 151357480 | over 1 year ago | I've removed the bottle return machine here: changeset/151688647 |
| 151661304 | over 1 year ago | Hi Matijn, I've just been there and had a look at the situation. From the south there is a sign in accordance with STVO § 52.1 "Fahrverbot" with the text "Privatstraße" in the centre. As I understand the law, this clearly states "vehicle=no" with no exception for bicycles. Why do you think bicycles are allowed here? |
| 145607976 | over 1 year ago | Laut basemap.at sind es 2633m. Woher nimmst du deine Quelle? |
| 151457707 | over 1 year ago | So can your change be removed? |
| 151649074 | over 1 year ago | Hi and thank you for your contribution! Please note for the future: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 151648105 | over 1 year ago | Lebst du ein Jahr in der Zukunft? ;) |
| 151641323 | over 1 year ago | No OSM data has been created twice. JOSM really seems to have combined two different changesets. There is no other explanation for the different times. I'm really sorry about that. |
| 151641323 | over 1 year ago | this was not intended. it seems that JOSM has re-uploaded changes that have already been uploaded. The part in Munich was already uploaded at 20:01, the changes in the Azores only at 20:34. I restart and then check whether something has been created twice. |
| 151622329 | over 1 year ago | Du hast an einigen Orten "
|
| 151632987 | over 1 year ago | Deleted duplicated way here: changeset/151635766 |
| 151633458 | over 1 year ago | Hallo und danke für deine Änderungen. Ich habe die Grillstelle wiederhergestellt und access=private ergänzt. Warum? Siehe osm.wiki/User:Nakaner/Positionspapier_Geheimhaltung#Warum_werden_diese_Objekte_erfasst?_Warum_werden_sie_nicht_gel%C3%B6scht? Danke :) |
| 151622329 | over 1 year ago | Hallo und danke für deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte für die Zukunft: Changesets sollten lokal sein. Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber den Überprüfern, wird empfohlen
Warum? Sieh dir den Abschnitt
Vielen Dank für deine Überlegungen, einen schönen Tag und viel Spaß beim Mappen! |
| 151599418 | over 1 year ago | Danke dir. Ich habe motor_vehicle=destination ergänzt. Wobei ich dann nicht den Unterschied zwischen der aktuellen Beschilderung ohne Zusatzzeichen sowie dem Zusatzzeichen "Anrainer frei" verstehe. |
| 151599418 | over 1 year ago | Hi, du hast im Hau "motor_vehicle=yes" gesetzt. Bevor ich das wieder lösche, wieso denkst du, dass es da hin gehört?
Das dort geltende Gesetz: https://www.jusline.at/gesetz/stvo/paragraf/67 Danke dir! |