mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147110602 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 147082000 | almost 2 years ago | Danke Metzor! Hab es in meiner Vorlage ausgetauscht :) |
| 147082000 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 147072641 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 147023666 | almost 2 years ago | Auch hallo und einen schönen Tag, heute gleich so freundlich? |
| 147046470 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 147038013 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 147034628 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 146979577 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 146958857 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 146954749 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 146954817 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 146954888 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, please note: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
| 146943310 | almost 2 years ago | I have partially reset this changeset and restored the wrongly changed objects.
|
| 146944869 | almost 2 years ago | I have partially reverted this changeset and restored the unnecessary and partially incorrectly deleted elements (such as the street relation).
|
| 146943641 | almost 2 years ago | Thank you for the change! |
| 146945625 | almost 2 years ago | If this object has no physical presence, it does not belong in OSM because the OTG rule cannot apply, right? In addition, the local team itself writes that they purchased a new crew transport vehicle (MTW), a Mercedes Vito, in 2018. In addition to team transport, it is also available as an emergency vehicle with the appropriate rescue equipment for operations if required. Then the description is not entirely accurate, correct? I also doubt that the term "First Responder" is commonly used in Austria. The correct term would appear to be "Rotkreuz-Ortsstelle Alberschwende". What do you think? |
| 146944558 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, why did you add building=yes to the already existing building:part=yes? Neither makes sense and this building is part of a larger outline, which is why building:part was completely correct. |
| 146944869 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, you have deleted the house number 16 without replacement. May I ask for what reason? |
| 146943641 | almost 2 years ago | It seems to me that the text in the "description" is not a description for the object, but an instruction for other mappers, right? Then it would definitely be better placed in note. Since it's only in English, even in "note:en" please. |