Because the "building" itself is untouched, only the nodes of the building are moved.

Hi guys, that's the wrong changeset you're discussing.
This changeset was created February 10, 2023. When you go back in time to the 9th Feb 2023 the building is already wrong: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DKo

You can go back to Nov 02, 2022 till the building is correct: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DKp

That means the building geometry was "destroyed" on this date. When you search for changesets on this date in this area you will find this one: changeset/128381950

To prove this, check the geometry changes in OsmCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128381950/

Cheers

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, man kann darüber diskutieren, ob es Straßenlaternen wirklich in den Daten benötigt, aber einfach löschen?
node/11064389667/history

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Wird der Ortsname in CAPSLOCK geschrieben?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144256771

Hi, danke für den Edit. Da sind nur leider noch so viele Objekte mit falscher Adresse, welche alle von (mittlerweile) gelöschten Usern entstammen.
Siehe: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DFX

Deshalb sollte man die Datenherkunft und Korrektheit vermutlich generell hinterfragen. Was denkst du?

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Super, danke!

Danke, habe es auf tunnel=yes umgeändert.

Hi, gerade über Osmose entdeckt. Was soll das sein? way/1217847796

Changeset reverted.

Hi, warum hast du den Bach in eine Straße umgewandelt?
way/198740707/history

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hallo Hungerburg, die Frage in SC ist: "Gibt es hier akustische Signale für Sehbehinderte?".
Zusätzlich steht unter der Frage: "Tipp: Achte auf Lautsprecher. Nicht alle Tonsignale können über eine Taste aktiviert werden."

Heißt für mich: Ich höre beim warten nichts, ich höre beim Grünsignal nichts, ich sehe keine Lautsprecher. Respektive ist die Antwort Nein.

Wie soll eine Funktion, die nur ein ganz kleiner Personenkreis aktivieren kann, vernünftig eingetragen werden? Thema "Verifizierbarkeit": osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Die Wiki-Seite geht auch nicht auf eine versteckte Funktion der Taster ein: traffic_signals:sound=*

@woodpeck: here's something very wrong now: way/231741163