Hi, ich schaue diese Woche nochmals vorbei und sehe mir die Situation nochmals vor Ort an und werde Fotos machen.

Hi, ist diese Relation dann mittlerweile überflüssig? relation/1671147#map=17/47.54825/11.12531

Vielen Dank!

Danke für's nachschauen! Schönen Tag noch.

Hi, endet die Dorfstraße hier wirklich so, ohne in die St2014 zu führen?
node/982082175/history#map=19/47.87117/10.74680

Quelle: http://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/world/all/819251255069622077

Hi, is there a oneway missing? way/1059753528
Otherwise seems like a "dead-start".
Thanks!

Source: http://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/world/all/820395537435014009

Hi, you have warped the road here so that navigation becomes impossible. Please pay better attention to what you upload in the future! Thank you very much.

node/9287675327/history

Hi, hier fehlen auch die Werte für "from" und "to": relation/14139878

Schau dir mal die Tabelle auf dieser Seite dazu an: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Relation:restriction&uselang=de#Members

Hi nurdafur, bei deinen Abbiegebeschränkungen hast du "from" und "to" vergessen. Ich habe es für dich nachgetragen, aber gerne beim nächsten Mal darauf achten :)

Hallo, was soll "Nata Lee left" an dieser Stelle bedeuten? Hast du dazu eine genauere Beschreibung?

Thanks for fixing! This was not intended

Hallo Peter, danke für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert. Viele Grüße

Yes :) With help of the Austrian community we decided to tag all ways with motor_vehicle=private. It's not the perfect tagging but should describe the current situation best. Thanks!

Hi, I changed the global access tag to the motor vehicle access tag as you can see in the history of the participated ways. There are gates but there both were open for pedestrians on my last visit.

Hallo rkugler,
du hast die Mühlstraße für Kraftfahrzeuge gesperrt. Gilt dies auch für die Verlängerung hier?: way/628266911

Und wie lange ist die Sperre geplant? Könntest du das ggf. als note=* dazuschreiben? Vielen Dank!

Hello Planification transN, you have created a highway=service in this changeset which is located completely above a highway=secondary. The highway=service also has a residential area and some routes attached to it.
The service road is this:way/954240284/history
The secondary road is partly this: way/44032712/history

Both cannot exist here at the same time and since they are exactly on top of each other, one of them should be removed. Could you please take care of this? Thanks a lot!

Hi AntiCedros,

Unfortunately, you have also caused some new errors when "fixing some errors" by changing the turn restrictions on the L 598. There are now some missing "to" and "from" values in the relations.

Could you please fix this again? Thank you very much!

Zu finden unter: https://www.verkehrsinfo-bw.de/Baustellen?strassen=B32
Stichwort: Instandsetzung Gallusbrücke
Dauer wohl bis 21.10.2022

Thanks for your answer. Also, after consulting with the tagging mailing list I conclude:
The on-site signage is an exception for bicyclists at traffic signals that overrides the national “Highway Rules” for this particular case. In some countries, such as the Netherlands, there is no need for explicit signage here, as this is already regulated uniformly for all traffic lights in the ordinance.

In Germany and Switzerland, there is only the signage for a right turn on red. In France, the signage exists in the variants right, left, straight ahead and whatever other combinations.
See: https://www.lyon.fr/deplacements/les-modes-doux/panneaux-m12-les-cedez-le-passage-pour-cyclistes

The signs that are described on the webpage of Lyon definitely don't say that someone should give way to the cyclists but that the cyclist have to give way to the others, pedestrians as well as vehicles. The special feature is that the meaning of a red light is changed from a mandatory stop to a "give way".

For this situation we have already “red_turn:[right/left ..]:bicycle=yes” at “highway=traffic_signals”

(plus a draft for a proposal from 2016
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/turn_signals, that hasn't been changed in the last 6 years but is linked to in the wiki as "newer": traffic_signals:turn:bicycle:forward=all|right_on_red - I don't favour that, too many features in one single tag.)

By consensus of the tagging mailing list relations seems really heavy to see and maintain and we agreed that a relation usually wouldn't be necessary. And in fact: the signs don't make up a restriction. The restriction relation is a tagging scheme which is most useful for routing applications. The above mentioned signs don't make up restrictions in routing, just may reduce the estimated time at a traffic light node for bicycles. So it really could be useful as additional tag at the node highway=traffic_signals as already wrote.

I really would recommend to read the wiki-page to highway=traffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_cyclists

Vielen Dank für deine Auskunft! Habe das entsprechend vermerkt :)

Vielen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung! Ich habe einfach mal der Gemeinde geschrieben, ob das Anrainer frei nach wie vor besteht.
Viele Grüße!