Cheers!

Hi - you've mapped two solar panels with a capacity of "2 W". Is that really true? It's an incredibly small value. Perhaps you meant "2 kW"?

(node/6387828821 and node/6387828809)

Thanks. I visited today and can confirm it's brownfield, no construction indicated. Now fixed.

Ah, I see you saw construction work at the Bromley-by-Bow gasholders. Do you happen to have any further info on what's going on? The reason I ask is, I was about to edit them to add their Grade II listed status... which has implications for construction work, of course.

Hi - is source=solar a glitch?

Great, thanks Jerry. I've just detected this glitch myself, and was about to ask if the tag was deliberate or not.

Great :) all the best

:) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/05/worlds-first-solar-cycle-lane-opening-in-the-netherlands

Ah the tags are also on this street: way/709213184

Hi Tony - thanks for the solar panel edits! I discovered a weird item - there seems to be a street tagged as a solar panel here: way/589660896

Perhaps it was a copy and paste error and the tags were supposed to land on some other object nearby?

Hi Djministe - thanks for the solar panel edits! I discovered a weird item - there seems to be a street tagged as a solar panel here: way/476353854

Perhaps it was a copy and paste error and the tags were supposed to land on the node that's a little bit to the right of this?

I see some location=yes tags here. Were they perhaps intended to be location=roof?

Thanks for your edits! Be careful - you accidentally pasted some info (from your CV?) into one of the fields. I've fixed this now.

Great work. I've just been travelling around here and I confirmed a lot of the landmarks you've mapped. Thanks!

Hi - thanks Eggie.

Ceasar Sun: you could use "description:cn" instead of "name"

Hi - what is this monument? I visited this exact location in the past month. I did not see a monument here, and definitely not something with a Chinese name. Is this really correct?

Hi - there's quite an odd copy-paste error in these two nodes!

node/6844935727

node/6844935728

I at first thought it might be spam until I recognised your user ID.

Oops, I should have noticed that the number didn't come from you originally - thanks

Output of "2.0" should be perhaps "2.0 MW"? - On way/404294617

Hi - thanks for doing this. I noticed one error, so just to let you know:
You've tagged the solar farm with plant:output:electricity=* which is not normal, the asterisk should usually be replaced by either the actual capacity (such as "3 MW") or just "yes". I'll update that tag