Hi and welcome to OSM!
This shop's name sounds more like a computer store, is it really a supermarket?

cheers,
Matthias

Hi, thanks for your addition! Please remmeber though to name things only with their actual names - "fuel station" is what it *is*, and that's what its POI type amenity=fuel says already. It's not what it's *called* - that could be "Ceypetco Rajagama" or something.

cheers,
Matthias

Hola,
adicioné un área, un par de calles y place=neighborhood, baseado en imagen satelital. Está bien así?

Ah, I see 🙂 I'll go split it up into two nodes with different level tags then. Thanks!

Is this a hostel or a doctor's? Both names and physical tags are contradictory.

Hi,
I was just adding a few destination_sign relations to major roads around here when I came across way #377806462. It has both "destination" and "destination:to" set, pointing in opposite directions. I've never seen destination:to, and it seems redundant. Was that a mistake or is it that I just don't get how it works? :)

cheers,
Matthias

Hi,
that phone number was fine, it should be in international format. See phone=*#Usage
cheers,
Matthias

Hola,
como lo has cambiado la Vía al Paramo, así corresponde bien con el imagen den BING. Pero en este área hay bastante trazos GPS que indican que este no está muy exacto aquí. El imagen den Maxar está mejor. Lo he cambiado un poco otra vez con la ayuda de los trazos.
Saludos,
Matthias

Hola,
he encontrado varios nodes tuyos como #249414299 en esta región. Son restos de la edición de alguna cosa que se pueden limpiar o sea que solamente no entiendo el sentido? Pq waterway=river en un node, con el nombre "Quebrada de Ledrovan" donde no parece haber ninguna quebrada, no lo entiendo pero prefiero preguntar antes de borrarlo todo :)

saludos,
Matthias

Hi,
what's the correct name here, Ban Nam Poun our Ban Naxou?

Hi,
are you sure about these residential streets? One was connected to a boundary, I suppose you meant to connect it with the track a few meters north of it? And is there really no connection between those two ways across what looks like a construction site?

Hi and welcome to OSM! Some good updates you made there! Just a note though: it doesn't really hurt to add some tags, but they're not all that useful either. E.g. don't add internet_access=no unless everybody would expect there to be internet access; usually you add it only if there is. Same with oneway=no on a street - a street is two-way be default, only add oneway=yes if it is indeed a one-way street.

cheers,
Matthias

Ohai Oli, willkommen bei OSM :)
Feines Update - ist das auch schon alles betoniert? Ich hatte das noch als Erdstraße eingetragen (surface=ground).
Und die südliche Straße, hamse da endlich die Brücke fertig gemacht? Nach nur so 5 oder 6 Jahren? :D

I'm not sure where the new location is but I'll remove it here, just re-add it at the new place.

Thanks! Just wanted to make sure as it looked kinda strange :)

Is the road coming from the south really unconnected now?

Hi,
that's better already :) Just another thing: please don't mix Lao and English in one tag. Lao goes in "name" and "name:lo", English in "name:en". Normally you will see only Lao on the map but some renderers will show both: https://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html?zoom=15&lat=54.8338&lon=37.62147&layers=B000TT#
This gets really confusing if name:en contains Lao, too.

cheers,
Matthias

Thanks for the additions, good to have more Lao names tagged here. But please use name:lo for Lao. You can also overwrite any English name in "name" without suffix if you want, just leave the English name in name:en.

Cheers,
Matthias

Hi,
that way with a "surface" tag doesn't really make sense. I suppose it should have been waterway=stream, but inside the lake (landuse=reservoir, reservoir_type=water_storage would probably be better for man-made catchments) that's also not really clear.

cheers,
Matthias

Thanks! I removed the old name and leftover website tag.