1. added name and ele (DEM)

    Closed
    #147263292 0 1 0 0

  2. created

    Closed
    #147087453 1 0 0 0

  3. created

    Closed
    #147071832 1 0 0 0

  4. created

    Closed
    #147070231 1 0 0 0

  5. added name

    Closed
    #147068846 0 1 0 0

  6. created

    Closed
    #147067205 1 0 0 0

  7. created

    Closed
    #147066647 1 0 0 0

  8. set ele according DEM

    Closed
    #146974856 0 1 0 0

  9. moved to summit and set ele according DEM

    Closed
    #146924648 0 1 0 0

  10. Made a mistake

    Closed
    #146914383 0 1 0 0

  11. Moved towards summit according DEM, tbc

    Closed
    #146914054 0 1 0 0

  12. fine tuned according imagico.de

    Closed
    #146913293 0 1 0 0

  13. fine tuned according imagico.de

    Closed
    #146912784 0 1 0 0

  14. Moved towards summit according DEM, tbc

    Closed
    #146912675 0 1 0 0

  15. ele according Copernicus DEM - better than empty for sure

    Closed
    #146912272 0 1 0 0

  16. Moved to summit according ESRI and Copernicus DEM

    Closed
    #146911313 0 1 0 0

  17. Moved to summit according imagico.de Ohio Range

    Closed
    #146911117 0 1 0 0

  18. Back to original - my change was a mistake: DEM (and as a consequence opentopomaps) is not a good guidance for elevation in case of small islands, resp. in coast neighborhoods in general

    Closed
    #146863602 0 1 0 0

  19. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146818955 0 1 0 3

  20. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146818625 0 1 0 0