-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe typo?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe typo?
Closed
-
There is an existing peak meters away - no need for a new node! I copied the additional local bname to the existing node.
Closed
-
Added alt_name_1 from new duplicate peak before deleting the other one
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
Location and description in source did not match at all, and ele was off by 100s of meters. Now description, location and ele match.
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele adjusted according DEMs
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe typo?
Closed
-
As DEM is consistent with OSM and https://data.geus.dk/geusmap/?mapname=stednavnedb for all neighbors, it is fair to assume that it is OK for this one, too. In addition, the orig. ele of 1680 is twice the hight compared to neighbors in short dist. Nogo.
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
prob. typo: first two digits were flipped
Closed
-
ele was massively wrong
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed
-
ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?
Closed