1. if the location is right, then 860 might have been the feet value - nit it needs to be meters by OSM definition! If the much higher elevation should be right, then the location must be to the east quite a bit, and the elevation may be beyond 1000 meters.

    Closed
    #146795702 0 1 0 0

  2. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146795288 0 1 0 0

  3. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146792762 0 1 0 0

  4. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146792734 0 1 0 0

  5. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146792617 0 1 0 0

  6. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146792526 0 1 0 0

  7. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146792430 0 1 0 0

  8. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146792369 0 1 0 0

  9. ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data.

    Closed
    #146775504 0 1 0 0

  10. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146752162 0 1 0 0

  11. ele was wrong by factors - prob feet

    Closed
    #146752105 0 1 0 0

  12. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146751565 0 1 0 0

  13. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146751523 0 1 0 0

  14. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146751487 0 1 0 0

  15. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146751208 0 1 0 0

  16. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146750221 0 1 0 0

  17. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146750161 0 1 0 0

  18. ele was wrong by factors - maybe feet vandalism?

    Closed
    #146749893 0 1 0 0

  19. More likely elevation, can locals pls. check against ORIGINAL sources (not Wikipedia/Wikidata, which perpetuate erros quite often).

    Closed
    #146715984 0 1 0 0

  20. ele is very much off DEM, which is quite reliable meanwhile. What is the ORIGINALsource of elevation? Wikipedia does not count, as it often perpeptuates errors from other sources.

    Closed
    #146715647 0 1 0 0