OpenStreetMap
martien-176's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 119840689 | over 3 years ago | This looks well mapped and fixed. Thanks.
|
| 119721268 | over 3 years ago | Hi, you requested a review of your mappings here. Most of the 12 buildings you did here are well mapped. However, 2 of them have odd shapes. It is hard to see (depends also on the quality of your monitor), but if you zoom in enough you can see these are just as rectangular as the others, the one imo being 2 buildings located close to another. So please keep mapping (and with more experience the quality will increase automatically). Regards.
|
| 119724445 | over 3 years ago | And deleted incorrectly traced roads crossing buildings.
|
| 119450640 | over 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. The buildings you mapped here are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squarness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 119449677 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. They look quite good, as to position (tracing the footprint outline) as shape. Although i noticed some buildings do not have the square corners they should have (i also looked to changeset/119450640). So please keep paying attention to that. And please keep mapping. Thanks and regards, Martien, validator.
|
| 119470941 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to HOT. I am a validator and noticed these buildings you mapped. You traced it quite well. However there are a few issues. You mapped this group of buildings as one building. Zooming in it is more likely that they should be mapped as 3 separate buildings. Also the building that touches the other building shares a node. Please avoid letting buildings share nodes with neighboring features (buildings, but also roads or waterways). And always pay good attention to the squaring of your buildings. Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator. Please keep mapping.
|
| 119395944 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to HOT. You asked for a review. You mapped a lake here. Although the tracing is ok it is better to stick to buildings here in this project. This makes validation easier and will help the project be finished earlier (it is an urgent project meant to be finished within a week). Thanks and please keep mapping. Regards, Martien, HOT global validator.
|
| 119397594 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to HOT. These buildings look good as to shape (square corners) and position. Well done and thanks. Please keep mapping. Regards, Martien, HOT global validator.
|
| 119317240 | over 3 years ago | Hi, welcome to HOT. You asked for a review of your mappings. The buildings look good as to shape (square corners) and position. Also good to fix up buildings mapped by others. Take care not to let buildings cross other features like eg a barrier. I also noticed a few buildings tagged as house. Rule of thumb though in HOTOSM is to always tag building=yes, and let local mappers decide what the building actually is. Also, if possible, try not to delete mapped buildings done by others. If possible move them to an unmapped one. But in general, good work here, please carry on. Thanks for your time and effort. Regards, Martien, global validator.
|
| 119126355 | over 3 years ago | Hi nataliasalinas, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. I am a validator and looked at several of your mappings (as i always do with new mappers). Keep paying attention to the squarness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Take good care not to let buildings share nodes with other buildings or with eg roads. You can reach that by precisely tracing roads and buildings. And btw, you removed several buildings, maybe because these were not present on the imagery. But be carefull with that, it could be seen as vandalism. Better leave them and make a note in the task comment so that a more experienced mapper can look at it. Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 119125303 | over 3 years ago | Hi, you requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But keep paying attention to the squareness of the corners (although several are well mapped in this respect). Always draw buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. And btw, please stick to the required features to be mapped, here buildings and highways. Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 118217227 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Brooke, welcome to HOT. You added quite a lot of tags to an existing road here. Eg layer, maxspeed, oneway and so forth. As a HOT mapper you are only supposed to add a basic tag, eg highway=residential. That will suffice, local mappers will add more details later on. Please stick to this rule. Thanks for your cooperation.
|
| 118257397 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, you mapped several buildings here without tagging them as building=yes. Besides that, pay attention to the squarness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square as you can. And of course your mapping should match the outline of the building on the imagery. Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
|
| 118217381 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,welcome to HOTOSM. You requested a review of your mappings. I noticed you mapped a lot of buildings on top of already mapped buildings. It almost seems if you are tracing them over the existing ones. This is not good. It will damage the map and possible endanger the people on the ground who depend on these maps. So please only map buildings where there are none existent. Thanks for your cooperation. Regards, Martien, HOTOSM validator.
|
| 116974614 | almost 4 years ago | You have been blocked by OSM for vandalism some time ago. The block has been lifted now, but i notice here that you started again. Please stop or you risk another block. Thanks.
|
| 117345942 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done. The only issue is with the surrounding residential area. It shares a node with a building, while it shouldn't. So always pay attention when drawing these and to keep a gap between their edges. Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 117361744 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to the location. But pay attention to the squarness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Please watch this short video for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 117362230 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings are well mapped. Good location and outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 117326354 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings are well mapped. Good location and outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|
| 117330938 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to the location. But pay attention to the squarness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Then you are good. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|