I think this is ok as the tag is about the type of the building, not about its current use. From the wiki:

"[T]he value [of building=*] may be used to classify the type of building. Note that it may be not the same as the building's current use (tagged using building:use=*). For example, a hospital building that is abandoned or repurposed to be a marketplace is still a building=hospital"

4KK, please:
- do not insult people
- do not engage in edit wars.

If you disagree with another mapper whether this highway should be primary or secondary, please discuss this with them instead of editing back and forth. Preferrably discuss this kind of stuff in public, so other mappers understand what's going on.

OK sure. Thanks for improving OSM!

Happy mapping!

I made modifications only at locations where I was certain -- so there should not be any "ghost bents" or such

It is certainly more precise than it was previously. I think it has two advantages:

1) Even if there is a global offset of a few metres, the shape of the path is better represented.

2) The distances are more accurate if bents are represented more realistically.

I did record a gpx when I went there but unfortunately something went wrong when saving it. But I do remember the shape and position was unsatisfyingly unaccurate at times.

Feel free to revert if you believe the previous state was superior to the current in any way.

Great, thanks :-)

There is a note which disagrees with the opening hours you tagged on the parking. Do you have an idea who is correct?

note/3349203

way/974837171

...and I've moved to fixme from the power line to the power mast
node/1517026862

Thanks for the clarification. I've move the cables near RTP Bežigrad underground

Hi,
I don't understand the fixme on way/668307651

What is it that needs to be fixed?

You set access=no to way/974769289

This implies no pedestrians are allowed here (even with highway=pedestrian). However you set bicycle=yes, which looks suspiciously like a tagging mistake. Did you perhaps just mean motor_vehicle=no ?

I've fixed it. Thanks for spotting this!

Sorry, no that was by accident!

Congrats on creating nodes 9999999999 and 10000000000 !!

Hi there, it seems you've been mapping a lot of stuff using outdated aerial imagery; thereby destroying edits that I made where I used newer imagery. For example you removed this new building way/186909634 that I had added and instead you re-created buildings that do not exist anymore, like this one: way/1047275934

Ah, no worries!

Try josm! A bit of learning, but after 2 days practice you will not want to switch back anymore.

Hi,
There is no horse=yes tag on way/953824979/history

Did you mean some other bridge?

Sorry, that must have been a copy+paste mistake. I've corrected it.

Thanks for pointing this out!

Thanks for the reply!
And thanks for your research and the links! Since this route is documented, I think we should keep it. Probably good to make adjustment in location where bikes clearly can't be used like here: osm.org/go/0Ik1xz_Pc--?m=

So are you saying that both

- this one way/844378265

- and the one a few hundred metres to the North node/3876340592

exist in reality?