that's fine. for a very complete example, you might want to check this one: way/217619432

regarding way:1004754859 (El Alcazar), it's best not to join areas with ways, and I think that you really want to represent the building, right? there's ways to describe complex buildings like this one, with the "simple 3D" tagging style. I do not master it enough for telling you how to use it. please do check the osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings wiki page, and my guess is that you will have even more questions after reading that page. I would then try here: https://help.openstreetmap.org/

if you're not afraid of a more complete editing program, you might want to have a look at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

a common beginners mistake is to look at a specific rendering and trying to optimise tagging based on that result. however, OSM is a geographic database where we can represent reality at such a detailed level, that no single renderer can put it all in the result. also, renderers are updated and start acknowledging more of the information we put in the database. so it's best to tag reality accurately even if it is not shown in the "standard map".

is it one golf course, with its several holes, or is it several distinct courses?

hola bienvenido a OSM. es normal hacer errores como principiante. mejorarse es fácil, revisando la wiki, siguiendo tutoriales, preguntando en los varios canales de comunicación disponibles.
osm.wiki/Panama

hi. it's always a good thing, to have people active locally. here in Panamá it's also a rare opportunity. I see you still have limited experience, would you stay in contact with the rest of the OSM community? coordinating and optimizing tagging. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61

You enjoy guessing, don't you! I would not correct anything without knowing what is correct.

But: »Don't focus on the rendering.«

I would ask on some support group or forum for help finding the best tag. Or look for a similar physical object in a notoriously well mapped area, like Germany, or France, or the UK.

hi. thanks for the feedback! The last point is a known problem here in Panamá. Regarding the procedure, »extracted the UTM coordinates and created points in qgis«, you mean copy-paste and having QGis make the UTM→Geographic conversion?

hey, I commented to your second edit, while this was the relevant one, which I had not seen. translating the text of the Gaceta Oficial into a polygon isn't easy. have you seen the two Wiki page I have written on this subject? osm.wiki/ES:Panama/Protected_Areas
it would be very nice if you shared your mapping experience, so we can improve the current practices.

hey, thanks for the edit.
which maproulette is it?

hi. your comment made me quite curious. what do you mean "added new comarca", in particular since you did not add new administrative divisions, just edited the already existing.

… using maps from the IGNTG. pffffffffff.

hi. I did not personally see the place, but are you really sure it's 'natural=cliff' that what you mapped? my first guess would be two vertical concrete walls, but I prefer not guessing, so if you say you it's cliffs the best way to express reality …

I guess if I ever visit the place (or if we have some photographic coverage for the area) we could decide whether the wood is part of the "Aldeas Infantiles SOS" or not. my guess is that there's a single uninterrupted fence all around the area, that includes the wood. but without checking, I would not know. I have commented to the original author. changeset/107731229

hola. you here added another checkpoint, it's not just a building. I don't think that you need the layer=-1 for a building passage (it's not underground). maybe you can use this hint? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/885697321
(please note: I'm asking for review on my contribution.)

hola. si se encuentra en la zona y no piensa poder editar directamente, también tiene la oportunidad de apoyar el proyecto OSM con información, que otros puedan procesar. los invito a conocer la comunidad OSM, por ejemplo en el foro https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61 o en las listas de correo https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/

hola, thanks for attention to detail. I'm wondering, maybe there's no need for a relation excluding the wood and the pitch. your opinion?