OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
121645665 over 3 years ago

hi. this looks like an import, and of impressively bad quality. what is going on here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121645665

120068217 over 3 years ago

changeset/122480049
this is my interpretation of how to do it better. please have a look, hope you agree, or let me know what you consider an improvement.

120068217 over 3 years ago

hola. thanks for adding valuable information. about bus stops: you have added some as this one (node/9686577910), some like this other (node/9686577911).
I think it's better to have all like the first one (bus=yes; highway=bus_stop; public_transport=platform), with the optional information regarding bench and shelter, all associated to the same Node object, as for example (node/7546753582)

122345658 over 3 years ago

overpass query to find public_transport platform inside public_transport platform:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jml

122345658 over 3 years ago

with this changeset you added several objects of type way, tagged as bus=yes; public_transport=platform, where we already had nodes (Way: 1069427290). this is a violation of the DRY principle (don't repeat yourself), which, within OSM, is the guideline 'one object for one feature' osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

90002845 over 3 years ago

his "ah bueno" reply meant in practice "I give up mapping (for the time being)". Now almost 2 years later he is back mapping with precisely the same style: not describing the content of his edits, adding roads where there's lanes, undoing minor edits which in the meanwhile I had done on his contributions, as in a typical edit war.

85697346 over 3 years ago

mapper came back with same mapping style and non descriptive changeset comments. i hope to find a viable compromise, after all, we just care for quality, we only need to understand what is best for OSM.

122391247 over 3 years ago

changeset/90002845
(Please don't use the same changeset comment "Actualizacion de los datos" every time - it doesn't help people to understand what you changed or why) (a kind request by a DWG member).

122391457 over 3 years ago

hola y nuevamente por favor no añadas vías que no existen nada más para facilitarle el trabajo al navegador. hay otras maneras. te he mencionado ejemplos, utilizando turn:lanes, y te he invitado a preguntar en la comunidad.

122345658 over 3 years ago

también hay esfuerzos dentro de Latam para alcanzar algo de formación de comunidad. osm.wiki/ES:LatAm

88432478 over 3 years ago

most of this users additions look as imports. according to Pascal Neis' web site, in 18 Mapping days RobertReynolds contributed 61 changesets, totalling 254,847
Map changes, for an average above 4 thousand changes per changeset.

it does not impact me, I just noticed this user in the Nicaragua statistics.

122353551 over 3 years ago

hi. I'm sure this was a random mistake, but please do try to improve these two points:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

122345658 over 3 years ago

hola. te he buscado unos ejemplos de como utilizar los turn:lanes.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jhX
dado que por supuesto no soy yo quien pone las reglas, por favor pide apoyo a la "community.openstreetmap.org". a lo mejor te estoy sugiriendo mejorar algo que ya está perfecto, y con gusto lo escucho de la comunidad.

122347159 over 3 years ago

hi Brayan. welcome back to OSM. please have a look at "turn:lanes", they are meant to represent lanes with compulsory direction, allowing for navigators to inform you that you should move to a specific lane of the same road. if you create fictive roads, the navigator will give instructions that will be difficult to understand, like moving to a different parallel road where there isn't any.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122347159

122230072 over 3 years ago

Si bien entendí el espíritu del proyecto, este tiene una importante faceta de aprendizaje. Revertir los errores que demuestran que no hubo aprendizaje, creo que sea la cosa más constructiva.

122230080 over 3 years ago

hey! we've reviewed, suggested, explained, corrected, and you're sgain adding data as if you hadn't received any feedback!

122230072 over 3 years ago

hey ... have you looked at the detailed feedback you and your group received, and all corrections performed on your input?

122208763 over 3 years ago

osm.wiki/Pt:Names

122208763 over 3 years ago

hola. bienevenido a OSM. quieres mapear una universidad? no te limites al edificio y el nombre: mucho mejor añadir el área, y darle etiqueta que la describa como institución educativa. "amenity=college" (graduate) o "amenity=university" (master).
osm.wiki/Pt:Key:amenity#Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o

122229824 over 3 years ago

office=publisher; node/9596731583