Way: 736159655, same simplification, would be reduced from 45 nodes to 18.

@Andrew, isn't this worth reviewing? it's 6-7 nodes at each 90° turn, Way: 442854934 composed of 124 nodes that simplified by JOSM with 0.6m error can become 64, and simplification still keeps 2-3 nodes at those 90° turns.

hi. you reinterpreted a local road as a rural track. I've been there and I can absolutely confirm the road hardly has any agricultural function, and it is the only access road to the villages and hamlets along it.

:+1: Grazie! Gute Nacht.

https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/169
https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/172

that's two examples on which I practiced. feel free to validate.

you could help me develop a good practice. what I had in mind was: you give me a polygon on which I would define a project on the tareas.openstreetmap.co (toc) tasking manager, and you would do your mapping task-by-task, setting each as "done" when you think so. it has very low visibility, the toc, no risk of attracting beginners to the area. from time to time I would revise and check if I can validate your tasks, or I could map an task and you would validate.

changeset/95381123 gives me an impression of the area you intend to review. or is it just randomized edits?

Hola Nordpfeil, thank you for adding buildings to this area of Panamá. I've been experimenting with the tasking manager at tareas.openstreetmap.co, would you help us with an extra test case? we would use this area you already chose, and after you complete a "task" some of us will review. (I'll try not to do too much myself.)

Hi. you should have noticed that there's disagreement on the `place` value for San Miguelito. it is larger than just a `town` and it is absolutely dependent on Panamá. for this reason I set it already twice as `suburb`. if you set it to `town`, there will be people changing it to `city`. please let's take this to the group, and document it in the wiki if necessary.

hola estimada Melisa Fonseca. los otros maperos de Panamá, que no somos YouthMappers, estamos desesperadamente intentando entrar en contacto con el Capítulo YMUP. no sabemos qué más intentar para coordinarnos con ellos.

Alvarado, hola, todo bien? me pregunto y te pregunto porqué has estado añadiendo elementos no correspondientes a la realidad. en menos que 2 minutos has añadido 16 edificios dificilmente reconocibles de la foto aérea. cuál es el propósito?

Alvarado, hola, todo bien? me pregunto y te pregunto porqué has estado añadiendo elementos no correspondientes a la realidad.

pero qué pasa? tienes prisa? de qué?

cuando puedas, por favor mira si quieres mejorar la geometría de tus contribuciones al mapa. eres mapero de experiencia, esto que estás añadiendo ¡es terrible!

no se entiende la razón de producir edificios que no corresponden con la realidad. estás dando la impresión de que el lugar está bien mapeado, cuando no es así.

what is going on here? all buildings you contributed are 9.2m×14.7, whereas the aerial images tell a different story. are you in a hurry? this changeset holds 21 buildings and follows by less than a minute your previous one. why are you doing this?

qué pasó en este conjunto de cambios? todos los edificios que dibujaste son de 9.2m×14.7m, pero en las fotos aéreas la readlidad es otra. tienes prisa? en menos que 1 minuto (desde el conjunto de cambios anterior) 21 edificios? porqué?

Hola Alvarado. podrías usar un poco más de atención con mencionar las fuentes? todo este conjunto no se ve en Bing, y los números no pueden salir de una foto aérea, cierto?

the buildings you added are all copy-pasted as if in a hurry. why are you doing this?

Hola. nos ayudas entender lo que haces?
you name 'Bing' as source, but of the buildings in this changeset only 4 exist in Bing. if I activate Maxar I still can't justify 9 of them. what is your source?