OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
123063339 over 3 years ago

Hello northben,
I think this case can be closed for now, given the answer received from user Jón.
Given the complexity of the situation "on the ground", it would be nice if you could give any information with the aid of photography, that said trails indeed do not exist. Is there any signage that tells people no trails exist at some point?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

122542059 over 3 years ago

Revert done:
changeset/123191987
Princess_Aurora can you check the result?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

122542059 over 3 years ago

Revert is now running...

123133241 over 3 years ago

Hello,
Why are you tagging every node of a building, also with the building tag?
A building should have building=yes on the outline, not on every node!
E.g. see this:
node/9862856425

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

122542059 over 3 years ago

The DWG asked (in a PM) bgo_eiu to give their comment to this revert.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

123063339 over 3 years ago

Hi northben,
I have asked the original mapper of that trail to give their comment here.

123063339 over 3 years ago

Hello northben,
Removing data from OSM is considered vandalism.
If trails exist (being visible "on the ground") they should be on OSM. The reason for the existence of a trail ("nondesignated") is not relevant here.
If trails are private, forbidden or otherwise not accessible, they should be marked with appropriate tags (like access=private/no/forbidden).
Can you restore the paths yourself?


Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

123132224 over 3 years ago

Hello,
Why are you tagging every node of a building, also with the building tag?
A building should have building=yes on the outline, nog on every node!
E.g. see this:
node/9862856425

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

122772902 over 3 years ago

osm.org/user_blocks/6099

122095119 over 3 years ago

osm.org/user_blocks/6064

117730823 over 3 years ago

10 jaar geleden werd dit nog getagd met:
landuse=farmland
farmland=plant_nursery
de huidige (geprefereerde) tag is nu:
landuse=plant_nursery
Zie:
osm.wiki/NL:Key:landuse?uselang=nl
en:
landuse=plant%20nursery?uselang=nl
Ik heb de dus de vorm van de tags aangepast, de inhoud (plant_nursery) kan ik niet controleren en is voor rekening van de oorspronkelijke mapper:
@lodde1949

Met vriendelijke groet,
Marc Zoutendijk.

121539340 over 3 years ago

Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

121590677 over 3 years ago

Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

121590790 over 3 years ago

Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

121590809 over 3 years ago

Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

121911604 over 3 years ago

Comment is wrong, should be: Added missing steps over river Schalesbach. Bicycles must dismount here. I passed this bridge on 3 june 2022 and had to take off all the lugage of my bicycle in order to pass this bridge.

118055583 over 3 years ago

What does your comment "jeffrey" mean?

120753679 over 3 years ago

osm.org/user_blocks/5996

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

120754266 over 3 years ago

osm.org/user_blocks/5996

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

120779874 over 3 years ago

osm.org/user_blocks/5996

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group