Note: the source is not what you see^
I forgot to change it.

Hi, It is more useful if you draw a parking as an area:
amenity=parking
Only if you don't know it's size you can use it on a node.

Did you receive and read the DWG messages sent tou your account?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Please remove the data in this changeset as per our request in a PM to your account mail.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Please remove the data in this changeset as per our request in a PM to your account mail.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Beste Hendrikklaas,
Je keuze voor construction=burned_church is op zijn minst discutabel, want iets afbranden is geen constructie!
Maak er dan maar building=ruins van.

What needs to be fixed?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

If it was your kid, you should keep him/her away from your computer.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

The DWG is aware of this (new) situation and we have informed user LukeTheEditor.
We asked him to reply to all your comments and discuss the situation to see what can be done to repair what was broken.

If reverts are necessary, please do so, but wait until we have a reply from LukeTheEditor (within 2 days).

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

The DWG is aware of this (new) situation and we have informed user LukeTheEditor.
We asked him to reply to all your comments and discuss the situation to see what can be done to repair what was broken.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

You could improve tagging by adding the code for the traffic_sign to the relevant highway.
traffic_sign=*
I think it should be:
traffic_sign=SE:D7
according to:
https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Vagmarken/Pabudsmarken/

And I like to add this:
What kind of traffic_sign is there on that path, if any? Luckily we have mapillary:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=56.89246122622751&lng=12.50353711564344&z=17&pKey=I8EzUEUQcaW9B7qHs5zj_A&focus=photo
In the wiki this is documented:
highway=path
Hence this is NOT a cycleway but a PATH where both cyclist and pedestrian have equal rights.
Hence your retagging is wrong. Please change it back to what it was.

I'm still awaiting your answer Gizbar.
Please inform me why you removed the buildings.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

The addition of a node and mark it as a building is not correct. Also all the details you have added to that node are already included in the building multi polygon.
Why did you add this node?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Dear Gizbar,
The DWG received a complaint about this changeset where you have removed a number of houses as can be seen on achavi:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76308299

From the underlying aerial photo for that region (as can be seen in JOSM or iD) I still can see the houses that you have removed.
Removing data from OSM - without contacting the mapper who has added that data is considered as bad practice.
Was there a reason for you to remove that data?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

You don't have to put the name "pond" on the map because the name is used to give a name to something and not to describe what something is! Because that is allready given in the tags your have chosen.
E.g. if something is tagged as "building=yes", you should not also use "name=building"!

So, can you remove that "name=pond" yourself now?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

You don't have to put the name "pond" on the map because the name is used to give a name to something and not to describe what something is! Because that is allready given in the tags your have chosen.
E.g. if something is tagged as "building=yes", you should not also use "name=building"!

So, can you remove that "name=pond" yourself now?
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

User Md jins had added the name of his college (Netrokona) to all the nodes and ways he had added to the map. Hence there were numerous roads, buildings etc. with that name.
I have changed that to source=Netrokona.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Note: the inclusion of Dubaha is from a different changeset that was still open.
It wasn't effected in anyway.

Also you are using landuse on a node instead of using it on an polygon.
Please read this:
osm.wiki/Map_Features
and this:
osm.wiki/Get_help
before continuing with your edits!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group